one explained just how the nation's most prestigious scientist was removed from public service. That is the focus of this book. Larger issues inevitably emerge from a rhetorical analysis such as this one. My research on Oppenheimer's role, in nuclear development in par- ticular, led to broader consideration of the interactions between the scien- tific and political worlds. What eventually intrigued me the most was the way the isolated, highly technical and mystical world of science and its Progress was interpreted in political terms for those of us on the Outside. The Oppenheimer case demonstrates clearly the merging of scientific and political terminologies and the influence that such a philosophical and rhe- torical union can have on policy. Oppenheimer opposed the government's and nation's terminological orientation, both literally and figuratively, and, as a result, was removed from government service. The chapters that follow explain the rhetorical strategies the government used in making its case against Oppenheimer and suggest how Oppenheimer might have fought back more effectively. Many people have encouraged and influenced my thinking about this area of inquiry. I owe thanks to professors Barry Brummett, Richard E. Crable, Charles J. Stewart, and especially Steven L. Vibbert, for their example as teachers and scholars. A host of colleagues and friends at Pur- due University also endured and responded to endless discussions about "those scientists." A heartfelt thank-you is extended to Denise M. Bost- dorff, Daniel O'Rourke, and Jennifer Stone, who listened beyond reason- able expectation. My colleagues in the Department of Communication Studies at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University also deserve a word of apprecia- tion. They have given me the moral and intellectual support I need to con- tinue my growth as a scholar. A special thanks goes to my department head, Robert E. Denton. His ability to provide the institutional support necessary to a young faculty in very difficult economic times amazes me. But even more importantly, despite increasing administrative duties, he continues to lead by example, both in his teaching and scholarship. I am honored to be his colleague and his friend. Finally, thanks to my family, who continue to believe in everything I do even when they are not exactly sure what that is. NOTE | 1. | Berke Breathed. "Bloom County", Washington Post, 23 March 1985, F24. | | | | -x- |