Idolatrie, Let them alone, they are great readers of Gods booke, and if they bee in errour, they will sooner finde it, having liberty of conscience, then being oppressed with the Tyranny of the High Commission Court or other kindes of persecutions which disquiet their consciences and troubles their patience. . . . . Let the Adamites Preach in vaults & caves as naked as their nailes, and starve themselves with cold, they thinke themselves as innocent as Adam and Eve were in their nakednesse before their fall, let them therefore alone till some innocent Eve bee so curious as to eate forbidden fruit, and then they will all make themselves aprons of figge leaves perceiving their nakednesse." The excuse for quoting this passage must be that it offers strong evidence regarding the authorship of the piece. If my analysis of Walwyn be correct, he was just the man to put truths of this sort in a way that to one not in tune with his spirit might seem the merest ribaldry. The consideration that militates against regarding the petition as a satire on the sects is that the satire, if satire it be, was far too delicate for the popular consumption of the age; seventeenth-century political satire went plainly labeled. Further, there is nothing in the piece to indicate at first hand what religious belief its author was supporting. An Anglican satirizing the sects would not have included apologies for the Arminian; Hyde had the skill to forge the book, but would scarcely have made it politically so pointless. Admitting the petition to be serious in intent, the internal evidence all points to its composition by a man mentally nearer like Walwyn than any other writer of the day. A comparison of the plan of the piece, which handles the Brownists, Socinians, Arminians, Papists, and Familists, in the same manner as the Puritans and Adamites, with a passage in A Prediction Of Mr. Edwards His Conversion, and Recantation, affords additional evidence. "You shal then see him a man composed of all those opinions he hath so much reviled! an Independent: so far as to allow every man to be fully perswaded in his owne mind, and to molest no man for wor- shiping God according to his conscience. "A Brownist; so far, as to separate from all those that preach for filthy lucre; An Anabaptist: so far, at least, as to be rebaptized in a floud of his owne true repentent teares: A seeker; in seeking occasion, how to doe good unto all men, without respect of persons or opinions; he will be wholly incorporate into the Family of love, of true Christian love, that covereth a multitude of evils . . . ." If the surmise be correct that Walwyn was the author of this plea, so daring that it could admit the worst practical effects that might result occasionally from the broad application of its principle, he as- suredly deserves a high seat among the men who fought the battle of liberty of conscience. -257- |