dissection in its pages. As I have said, this is not the book that I would have written had I had the freedom to alter received wisdom of what 'proper' books should look like. On the other hand, several of its chapters repeat the urgency of holding on to an alternative vision. In an essay written in 1924, the Danish writer Karen Blixen asked: Do some of you want to fly? Is it something you really want, and does the idea attract you more than anything else? Then hang on to your wish for a couple of thousand years and you will get wings. 3
It is not uncommon to find in fiction that women want to fly, whereas men are attracted to the sea. 4 This may be because for men the sea represents women, whereas for women flying is something that men do. Equally, the resonance of the flying image may owe its strength to women's urge to get out of their confines. Karen Blixen used a male name for her writing -- Isak Dinesen. When the American writer Carolyn Heilbrun wanted to write feminist detective stories, she also used a pseudonym, for fear of having her alternative vision used against her in her academic life as an aspiring professor of English literature. 5 In her most famous alter ego work, Death in a Tenured Position, 6 one of America's most renowned and misogynist universities is given some money to fund its first female professorship. After a hard search, an appropriately non-feminist woman is found for this post. She is discovered dead after only a few months. Everyone suspects the male professors of having killed her. But the female sleuth, a considerably more uncompromising version of Miss Marple, works out that she killed herself. The whole environment was simply too inhospitable. There are various messages in this. One is that women have their own ways of undermining masculine culture. Another is that things have got better, and there is no need to kill ourselves any more. A third is one to which the writer Carolyn Heilbrun herself draws attention: that no-one should be allowed to die seated comfortably in a 'tenured' position. If women achieve such positions, they must use them to go on being awkward. With age comes a blessed relief from the strain of having to be a 'female impersonator?'. 7 The chapters in this volume do, I suppose, speak of my own struggle to get away from impersonation. It is a fight for authenticity -- both for tenure and for the right to say things that will ensure that this particular form of male-invented closure is unlikely ever to be available to women. -xii- |