pictures on subjects from the history of the North, and his portraits. Only a few of the later ones show any tendency toward more thorough characterization; these few are, in a way, Eckersberg before Eckersberg; they are more nearly in his spirit than the portraits painted by Hornemann-- quite as able an artist--in his latest years under the direct influence of the torch-bearer of Danish art. On the rest of the older men who lived on into his time, Eckersberg made little if any impression. There is a slight trace in the work from the 1820's of Hans Hansen, a pupil or imitator of Juel's, of little ability. As an historical painter, Kratzenstein-Stub formed his style after Thorvald- sen's; as a portrait painter, more or less after Gérard's. Fritzsch, the painter of flowers, got his style, his effective composition, and the free swing of his brush from Monnoyer and other seventeenth century French or Dutch flower spe- cialists. Gebauer, likewise, had studied the galleries more diligently than nature. He by no means lacked delicate and romantic feeling for the animals and the landscapes he painted, but he did lack the courage to depend on his own impressions. In composition and in coloring he followed his Dutchmen to the end. The art of the outgoing period thus persisted, to some extent, into the first years of the nineteenth century in Den- mark. The majority of its devotees, however, wore out their moribund existence in the shadow, taking no place in the light of truth which Eckersberg's art spread abroad like the brightness of day; in this light the seedlings of future Danish art were sprouting and growing green in abundance. -246- |