broad way as inclusive of all forms of psychic participation is certainly a vital factor in enjoyment. In literature, individual variations in the relation of self to the story or drama are exceedingly diverse. They range from curious self-visualizations or other forms of explicit self- projection to emotional identifications or detached and almost selfless objectifications. It is, relatively, a simple matter identifying the self-responses in reading literature. We have here, therefore, a profitable method of studying differences in the forms which literary empathy may take and a chance to compare such experiences with empathy in the visual arts where this phenomenon was first noted. Sterzinger in his valuable experimental study of the moments of æsthetic enjoyment concludes that empathy (Einfühlung) is of relatively less significance than substitution of meaning (Unterschiebung) as it occurs in the metaphorical consciousness. 1 Those among his subjects who were unable to achieve substitution even under instruction were, Sterzinger asserts, noticeably matter-of-fact and prosaic in temperament. By means of his conception of substitution, Sterzinger is able to explain the effect of literary synæsthesia, and the quality of dreamlikeness that is so pronounced a feature in the enjoyment of poetry by certain subjects. Difficult, indeed, do readers find it to determine and phrase the precise feature in the æsthetic situation that gives certain of them a wonderful sense of infinite life, what they describe as the cosmic emotion. Dreamlikeness, atmosphere, richness and fluidity of suggestion, vagabondage of fancy, they exhaust their vocabulary striving to find the phrase of precision that can convey the mystery and stir of suggestion latent in Poe's lines: -- "Ah, by no wind those clouds are driven That rustle through the unquiet heaven -- Ah, by no wind are stirred those trees That palpitate like the chill seas Around the misty Hebrides!"
There are those for whom poetic enjoyment and the mystic experience are one. ____________________ | 1 | "Die Gründe des Gefallens u. Missgefallens am poetischen Bilder". Arch. f. ges. Psychol. ( 1913), 29, pp. 16-91. | -7- |