without impropriety, be included among methods of direct observation and experiment. These, then, with such assistance as can be obtained from deduction, compose the available resources of the human mind for ascertaining the laws of the succession of phenomena. Before proceeding to point out certain circumstances by which the employment of these methods is subjected to an immense increase of complication and of difficulty, it is expedient to illustrate the use of the methods by suitable examples drawn from actual physical investigations. These, accordingly, will form the subject of the succeeding chapter. CHAPTER IX MISCELLANEOUS EXAMPLES OF THE FOUR METHODS 1. Dr. Whewell's objections to the four methods Dr. Whewell has expressed a very unfavorable opinion of the utility of the four methods, as well as of the aptness of the examples by which I have attempted to illustrate them. His words are these: 1 Upon these methods, the obvious thing to remark is, that they take for granted the very thing which is most difficult to discover, the reduction of the phenomena to formulae such as are here presented to us. When we have any set of complex facts offered to us; for instance, those which were offered in the cases of dis- covery which I have mentioned -- the facts of the planetary paths, of falling bodies, of refracted rays, of cosmical motions, of chemical analysis; and when, in any of these cases, we would discover the law of nature which governs them, or, if anyone chooses so to term it, the feature in which all the cases agree, where are we to look ____________________ | 1 | Philosophy of Discovery, pp. 263, 264. | -233- |