2 Exclusionary Aspects within Psychological Foundations of Counselor Education We take a handful of sand from the endless landscape of awareness around us and call that handful of sand the world. -- Robert M. Pirsig Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
The concern and interest surrounding diversity and multiculturalism in counseling has forced a rethinking of the ways in which we counsel clients and educate future counselors. The multicultural movement continues to identify cultural gaps in traditional counselor education curricula. Counselor educators have been forced to look at inherent problems within the theoretical frameworks from which they function. It is time to take a deeper look. This chapter examines issues and problems in the standardization of educational programs and in the psychological foundation of counselor education. Of major concern are the exclusionary aspects of current theory and practice, more specifically, the link between power and knowledge, power and definitions of mental "health," power and practice, and the individual and group oppression brought about by biases in the foundational frameworks of psychology. This closer examination opens the door to a deeper critique of the current philosophy, which in turn advances an agenda of critical thought. DEFINING COUNSELING IN SCHOOLS Perhaps a logical approach prior to the discussion of further issues in counselor education is defining what comprises counseling in schools and the role of the school counselor. Counseling in schools differs from counseling conducted in other settings, such as mental health clinics, private practice, and psychiatric hospitals ( Baruth & Robinson, 1987; Nugent, 1994). The role of the school counselor has been articulated by the American School Counselor -13- |