XVIII Influence of the History of Religion on the Ideal of Historical Knowledge: Strauss, Renan, Fustel de Coulanges L AMPRECHT once pointed out that in the struggle between the champions of purely political historiography and those of the history of civilization the real point at issue had been gradually lost to view. There could be no question of committing history to a more or less definite content and holding it exclusively to this: "A science is characterized only secondarily by the extent of the field to which it relates; only with the rarest exceptions, and never through the idea, however profound, of its own internal course of development, will it make progress through the conquest of new territory, for this happens only by an improvement of its methods." 1 The boundary line thus drawn was justified, in epistemological respects, and might have served to bring the discussion back to its proper channel and keep it from going astray. But on the other hand the development of science showed at every step that although questions of content and method are logically distinct, conclusions as to the possibility or necessity of their complete separation cannot be based on this difference in the concrete work of scientific research itself. Here there is rather a constant reciprocal influence and mu- tual fertilization on the part of both factors. Every extension of the domain of a science reacts on the concept of its method; every step taken beyond its former territory drives it to deeper reflection on the character and individuality of the means by which it acquires knowledge. Hence the question of the content of history and that of its form are continually interrelated. We have already shown that fact in several typical examples. When Mommsen declared that the structure of a state could be understood only through its system of government and laws, the one-sided dominance of the purely philo- logical method came to an end. The connection between philology and linguistics on the one hand and law and political science on the other was raised to a principle of historical knowledge. 2 For Burck- hardt also it was of the highest importance to separate state, re- ____________________ | 1 | K. Lamprecht, Alte und neue Richtungen in der Geschichtswissenschaft, S. 4. | | 2 | See above, pp. 258f. | -294- |