why America will not follow England along that particular road. But what is likely to be the effect upon popular movement in America if a great eco- nomic democratization and emancipation is brought about in Britain, through an ease of political action which is denied Americans by that Constitution which they have been taught to believe the last word in political wisdom? If the contrast is striking, which it might well be, it cannot leave the mass of the American workers unaffected in their attitude to- wards existing political institutions. As to Utopianism and Impossibilism in social re- form, which some American critics anticipate as the result of "political" Labour Parties, it is certain that actual participation of working class organization in definite legislation would be a corrective of such tendencies. If the Bolsheviks had been for a gener- ation represented in a free parliament, if they had been obliged to submit their proposals to discussion, compelled publicly to meet objections; and if the public as a whole had been witnesses of that debate during a generation, one of two things would have happened: either the Bolsheviks would have lost all practical influence with the public, or they would have been compelled to eliminate the impracticable fea- tures of their programme. If we recall the outstanding feature of that English Parliamentary mechanism which has already been in- dicated, we shall see that participation of Labour leaders in parliamentary life will be a corrective of "impossibilism" in social legislation. That correct- ing influence is indeed likely to be all too strong. -91- |