10 Compatibilist Autonomy and Autonomous Action The argument in chapter 9 for externalism about psychological autonomy provides a partial answer to the focal question of part II of this book, the question what we can add to an ideally self-controlled, mentally healthy person to yield an autonomous person. 1 One worry is that values and other pro-attitudes on the basis of which a self- controlled person makes self-assessments, practical judgments, and the like might be attitudes that he is compelled to have. Bestowing what I have called "authentic- ity" on an agent helps with that problem: authentic agents have no "compelled*" pro- attitudes. 2 However, other problems remain. Those deriving specifically from incompatibilist worries are set aside in this chapter and taken up in the next. In this chapter, as in chapter 9, I take no stand on the truth or falsity of determin- ism. Properly speaking, an account of autonomy that is presented as being neutral on this question is presented as being a compatibilist account. An account of autonomy that is correct whether or not determinism is true is correct even if determinism is true, and any such account is compatibilist. Here, again, I assume compatibilism while trying not to be heavy-handed about that assumption. I will examine a collection of obstacles to the autonomy of an ideally self-controlled person, with a view to locat- ing sufficient conditions for compatibilist autonomy. 1. Autonomous Action and Deliberation Full-blown, deliberative, intentional action, as I explained in chapter 1, involves some psychological basis for evaluative reasoning (e.g., values, desires, and beliefs); an evaluative judgment that is made on the basis of such reasoning and recommends a particular course of action; an intention formed or acquired on the basis of that judg- ment; and an action executing that intention. Starting at the bottom, we can see where the hard questions about autonomy lie. Imagine that S's proximal intention to A issues smoothly in his intentionally A-ing. If the intention is autonomously possessed, the action is autonomously per- formed. For example, if Al autonomously intends to vote for the Democratic presi- dential candidate now and that intention unproblematically issues in his intention- ally voting for that candidate now, then he autonomously votes for the Democratic candidate now. -177- |