in as acceptably with scientific psychology as with
ancient philosophy and religion. It is the only view
which completely justifies the universal practice of
modern psychology in leaving the "I," or Ego, out
of its analysis; for if the Ego were not transcen-
dental it would have to be treated analytically in
psychology, instead of being merely assumed. Be-
ing transcendental, the Ego has practically no in-
terest for psychology or science.

Modern psychology is truly said to be psychology
without a soul, but if the transcendental point of
reference or subject is what is meant by the term
soul, psychology not only does not deny the soul,
but positively affirms it. We must, however, bear
in mind the fact not only that we can know nothing
about the Ego, but that there is nothing to be known
about it.

-341-