we know all too little about how their evangelicalism affected, if at all, the empirical side of Benjamin Silliman's geology, James Dwight Dana's mineralogy, Arnold Guyot's glacial geomorphology, Joseph Henry's physics, Matthew Fon- taine Maury's oceanography, to take just a few American examples. Through the work of Michael Gauvreau and Nancy Christie we see just how important practical engagement was in the arena of sociology. For it turns out that Ca- nadian sociology in the decades around 1900 emerged out of a Christian tra- dition of social survey energized by social conscience. Here the theoretical works of Marx, Durkheim, and Spencer were largely irrelevant to the initial growth of the social sciences where practical involvement and the search for the reso- lution of pressing urban and rural social problems were the real catalysts. In a different arena again D. G. Hart highlights another battlefield -- that over the nature of the biblical documents. The struggle by evangelical Christians committed to an inerrant view of the Bible to find a place in the modern academy and the varying ways in which they have engaged "scientific" biblical scholarship are thus the objects of his scrutiny. These in turn become the vehicles by which Hart provides commentary on the uneasy relationship evangelical communities have sustained with the secular world of the university in the twentieth century. Our last chapter offers a reward for readers who persevere to the end. The dialogue that George Marsden overheard on Mt. Olympus among Socrates, Thomas Jefferson, and William Jennings Bryan is filled with whimsey of a deadly serious sort. What these three worthies have to say about science in se as well as about science for its social and political purposes amounts to a final rationale for the book as a whole. By recording encounters of evangelicals and science, the volume demonstrates again what has been shown so often before, that study of the physical universe matters in western society because, for at least 500 years, science has always concerned much more than science. Evangelicals and Science in Historical Perspective is to be regarded more as a begin- ning than an ending. It begins the task of uncovering the historical connections between the cultures of evangelical religion and scientific endeavor. If it succeeds in its aims it will convince readers that a full history of the connections between various sciences and various branches of evangelicalism, as well as other forms of religion, is a real desideratum. The essays drawn together here are designed to illustrate something of the rich material that is available for just such a syn- thetic study and to hint at how complex, though enriching, that story will eventually turn out to be. NOTES | 1. | John William Draper, History of the Conflict between Religion and Science ( London: Henry S. King, 1875); Andrew Dickson White, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom, 2 vols. ( London: Macmillan, 1896). | | | | | 2. | For revisionist accounts of this episode see J. R. Lucas, "Wilberforce and Huxley: A Legendary Encounter", Historical Journal, 22 ( 1979): 313-30; Sheridan Gilley, "TheHuxley-Wilberforce Debate: A Reconstruction" | | | | -10- |