times it was great -- the fault was mine alone. No principal executive can be expected to divine issues that are not presented. Clairvoyance is no proper attribute of a leader. Some of the things for which I should have fought and did not seemed at the time not worth a quarrel. Others were and I knew they were. I shall call attention to each such incident in this narrative. On five several occasions I felt that I should resign from NRA and on four I tried to do so. Toward the end my personal affairs were in such state that I had to do so. All this resides in black and white on the face of the record so that my leaving or not leaving NRI is no part of this argument. I had to leave. Nor is the outward form of reorganization any part of the argument because that form is almost exactly as I had planned it. The whole difference of opinion is that I believed that what NRA required was adherence to its principles and reorganiza- tion only for the purpose of passing from the phase of Code making to the phase of Code administration and I did want to stay long enough to see that change complete. The idea that pervailed was not a change from phase to phase but a paralysis of NRA with an apparent attempt to make a new one. On this I had no chance to make an issue as shall be related in Chapter XXIX. I did not realize all this when I laid down my charge. I thought the reorganization was to proceed on developed prin- ciples. I was even a little enthusiastic about it. It has only re- cently become clear that such is not the case. It is for this reason the latter part of this book had to be recast in fighting chapters instead of just remaining a narrative philosophy. -xii- |