CHAPTER FOURTEEN EPILOGUE: THE WRECK OF WELFARE ECONOMICS? SO long as we confined our discussion to generalities we could make some statements which were not purely destructive. How- ever, we were thereby largely avoiding the field of welfare economics. We have attempted to distinguish the cases in which rationality on the part of the citizens may lead them to desire the intervention of government. Having done this, are we now in a position to tender objective, unambiguous advice on specific problems? Can we say, in any given case, that the government should, or should not, intervene? Further, if we could give a verdict in favour of interven- tion, are we able to recommend the type and extent of the inter- vention? Here, as I indicated earlier, 1 I have serious doubts. We can obviously make recommendations about certain types of business practice such as those involving the use of physical violence as an instrument of monopolization, stock market manipulation, or even the problem of unemployment, for there are here involved patent misuses of resources which are frowned upon under the system of value judgments usually accepted by the economist. But if we ask ourselves, once our resources are all in some sense usefully employed, whether they are, or how they can be, best employed (the problem of ideal output), or whether anything should be done about their existing employment, then the answer is much more difficult. Here welfare economics seems to have produced its most widely cited results, and it is here that the bulk of the analysis has been directed; but how much confidence can we have in the results? We are given rules, often guardedly and with many provisos. In a completely nationalized economy, subject to the usual reservations, firms should sell their wares at prices equal to marginal costs. But if the costs of production of firms are interrelated so that marginal costs to the firm and to society differ, why should these goods be offered at their marginal cost to the firm producing them? And if in addition there are external economies of consumption, why should ____________________ | 1 | Above, pp. 12 and 24. Cf. I. Little M. D., "The Foundations of Welfare Economics," Oxford Economic Papers, 1949, especially p. 238. Cf. also Little Critique of Welfare Economics, especially Chapters XI and XIV. | -204- |