that which accompanies the name of Horus in the texts of the Pyramids (Horshesti). Very soon we found that what we believed to be the causeways stopped. The pots lining them were certainly not older than the XVIIIth or XIXth Dynasty, for we met with many painted fragments of that epoch. Occasionally the lines were interrupted by pockets of coarse pottery having an archaic appearance, and which will be described in another chapter. What we found in great number, and which seems to be everywhere in the sand at Umm el-Ga'ab, are thousands of quite small cups and tumblers in red earthenware, most of which were never used. Mr. Hall believes that their use was votive, like that of similar objects in Greece. They may be of a comparatively late date, since we found two ostraca, one of Osorkon I., and the other of one of the Psusennes. Where the lines of pots stopped were six mud figures of Osiris lying on a bed of hard sand, and a bit sandstone with the top of a car- touche where we read ( Pl. VIII.), which may be the beginning of the name Arsinoe. These figures are of remarkably good workmanship, as may be seen on that which is in the Ashmolean Museum. Two of them had strings of blue glaze beads round their necks. This find was in the direction of the tomb where M. Amélineau found the bed of Osiris now at the Cairo Museum. This black granite monument has been interpreted in various ways, and assigned either to the XIIIth Dynasty or to the latest Pharaohs of the XXXth Dynasty. Although the spot where the beds was found is about 40 metres distant from the place where statuettes were lying, it look as if there was there something in a special connection with Osiris. Therefore we resolved to excavate entirely in the next winter the space as far as the tomb of Shesti (Zer), and even to clear again that tomb. No previous excavator had touched the ground, which was attacked towards the tomb of Shesti (Zer), but the result was most disappointing; we did not even find small objects like the Osiris of the previous years, and even in the tomb itself, of which we cleared again the greatest part, nothing at all appeared; the result was purely negative. On the other side of the mound, we cleared again completely the tomb of Perabsen and a large space around it, so that we were certain that there was no other tomb. We found that the plan published by Prof. Petrie was quite correct, but in this place our researches were not as barren as on the other side. We discovered a certain number of clay sealings, which have been drawn carefully and published on Pll. IX.- XI. They mention two kings, Perabsen, whose name is generally surmounted by the God Set, and, Sekhemab. As to the question: which of them is the oldest, there can be no doubt that it is, and that he is the father of Perabsen. We read on one of these sealings the following words: , which seem to me to mean: "He joined the two lands for his son, the king of Upper and Lower Egypt, Perabsen." We must notice that Perabsen is called king of both parts of Egypt, though his ka name bears at the top only Set. These sealings, some of which are very similar to those discovered by Prof. Petrie, are on unbaked clay. They do not come from caps of large jars. The clearing of other tombs might perhaps results in the discovery of some more sealings of the same kind. Those published on Pl. X. look like deeds of property or inventories, probably of the property of the deceased. The plan added to the plates shows the amount of work we have done at Umm el-Ga'ab, the area which we excavated, and that which we pitted and trenched in order to make sure that no tomb had been passed without being excavated. It seems nearly certain that there is no new tomb to be discovered in the mound properly called Umm el-Ga'ab. -36- |