One finds analogous facts in the other systems of crystals. Whence come these apparent exceptions to that regular- ity which, really without knowing just why, we attribute to the laws of nature? Haüy was very familiar with these phenomena of the hemihedron and if he did not attribute to them any great importance it is because his theory led him to a somewhat distorted view of them, as I have just said. According to his conception the form of the integral molecule was, first of all, that which cleavage, the natural division of the crystal, gave to it. A cubical crystal of marine salt produces cubes by cleavage; a rhombohedral crystal of Iceland spar gives in the same way rhombo- hedrons. The rhombohedron was, therefore, for Haüy a primitive form. When we intersect the six lateral angles by planes having the same angle of inclination to the faces of the rhombohedron, we obtain by a perfectly regular process of derivation, the hexagonal prism of quartz. And so for the other cases. This conception formed a logical and coherent whole, but left Haüy indifferent to the questions of the hemihedron. In order to understand the hemihedral character of the rhombohedron, it is necessary to reverse the order and take the hexagonal prism as the primitive form. Then the rhombohedron can be derived from it only by way of the hemihedron. The same is true in the other systems. Weiss, the mineralogist, did this and straightway the hemihedron appeared to be a phenomenon more frequent than was supposed, and there arose a problem requiring solution. Why this deviation from the law of symmetry? This is what Delafosse tried to explain in 1840, by the aid of a deceptive hypothesis which to-day seems very childish. "In the prismatic quartz," he said, "the hemihedral constitution exists without being -6- |