the ideas of Virchow in pathology. If Fate had willed that he should not finish his task, that he should suc- cumb to the hemiplegia which attacked him at the time of his studies on silkworms, some other scientific man would have come, a Koch for example, for whom Pasteur would have been a precursor because he would have pointed out the way and left behind him the means of following it. His pathological work was the develop- ment and the compliment of his work upon the fermen- tations. But Pasteur had no precursor in the proper sense of this word, that is to say, he did not develop and extend the ideas of anyone else. He remains the equal of many when he demonstrates the bacterial origin of anthrax or of other diseases. Where he is without equal is when he discovers the attenuation of viruses, and when he introduces into science that fertile no- tion which allows us to act upon a disease by acting, not upon the sick person, as up to that time one had been in the habit of doing, but upon the pathological bacterium. What renders his history particularly interesting at this period, is that we can follow the stages of his progress. As we have seen, he had had for a long time the desire to enter into pathology. He was led to it by that secret force of things the elements of which we have just analyzed. He showed himself an eager student of medical works and after having borrowed from them certain words, as we have seen, at the beginning of his studies upon the disease of silkworms, he began to pene- trate into things. From this stage his choice was nar- rowly restricted. He had read and meditated on the works of Jenner upon vaccine, those which Coze and Feltz had just published. But what interested him most of all were the studies which Davaine was pursuing at this time upon the anthrax bacteridium. -232- |