| | VI THE TETRAGRAMMATON WITHIN JUDAISM The precise pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton is by no means easily recovered, although the view most widely accepted today is that the divine name was pronounced Yahweh. The literature on the subject is very extensive. 1 In the sixteenth century. Genebrardus suggested the pronunciation, Jahve, 2 largely on the strength of Theodoret's assertion that the Samaritans used the pronunciation 'Iabe, subsequent to the time when pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton was forbidden to the Jews. 3 The question as to the date when pronunciation of the divine name was no longer permitted finds no certain answer. In only compara- tively recent times has the pronunciation Yahweh been widely acknowledged. Even though Gesenius gave the pronunciation as Yahweh in his lexicon of 1815, scholars continued to employ the customary Jehovah, out of deference to tradi- tion, until Ewald began to use Jahveh (= Yahweh) regularly in his writings. Of the various alternative forms that have been proposed, the most probable is Yāhō or Yāhū. A. Lukyn Williams 4 has argued for such a pronunciation on the basis of theophorous names in the Old Testament ending in YHW, the Elephan- tine evidence, the attestation of Diodorus Siculus to a form 'Iao, 5 various pas- sages drawn from patristic sources, and charms and amulets which use the form ____________________ | 1 | Some of the more important contributions on the subject are: George F. Moore, "Notes on the Name YHWH", AJSL, XXV ( 1909):312-318; D. D. Luckenbill, "The Pronun- ciation of the Name of the God of Israel", AJSL, XL ( 1924):277-283; W. F. Albright, "The Name Yahweh", JBL, XLIII ( 1924):370-378; Leroy Waterman, "Method in the Study of the Tetragrammaton", AJSL, XLIII ( 1927):1-7; A. Lukyn Williams, "Yahoh", JTS, XXVIII ( 1927):276-283; F. C. Burkitt (in rejoinder to A. L. Williams), "Yahweh or Yahoh: Addi- tional Note", JTS, XXVIII ( 1927):407-409; G. R. Driver, "The Original Form of the Name Yahweh: Evidence and Conclusions", ZAW XLVI ( 1928):7-25; B. D. Eerdmans, "The Name Jahu", OTS, V ( 1948):2-29 (the article was written in 1942); G. J. Thierry, "The Pronuncia- tion of the Tetragrammaton", OTS, V ( 1948):30-42; B. Alfrink, "La Pronunciation'Jehova' du Tétragramme", OTS, V ( 1948):43-63; A. Murtonen, A Philological and Literary Treatise on the Old Testament Divine Names ( Helsinki: 1952), espec. pp. 54-61; Z. Ben-Hayyim, "On the Pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton by the Samaritans", Eretz-Israel, III ( 1954):147-154 (in Hebrew); M. Reisel, Observations ( 1957), pp. 41-61; George W. Buchanan , The Consequences of the Covenant (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1970), Appendix I, "The Pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton," pp. 316-317. | | 2 | Genebrardus, Chronologia ( 1567); ed. Paris, 1600, pp. 79f. | | 3 | Theodoret, Quaestiones XV on Exodus ( Exod.3:14). | | 4 | A. Lukyn Williams, "Yahoh", JTS, XXVIII ( 1927): espec. p. 280. Leroy Waterman reached similar conclusions, op. cit., pp. 3-4. B. D. Eerdmans, op. cit., p. 13, finds support also in Jer.5:12, by regarding lo' hu', "he is not," as a play on the name Jahu. G. J. Thierry, op. cit., p. 32, rejects this argument as unconvincing. | | 5 | Diodorus Siculus, Hist., I, 94. | -79- | |