where the brilliant polemics during the period of the first Stuarts mark the birth of a new age. * * * The word 'tolerance' needs some preliminary explanation. It existed in the sixteenth century and the Latin term tolerantia, from which it is derived, was used by the classical writers of antiquity. But it should be noted that with great authors such as Calvin and Montaigne the word kept its passive meaning of 'endurance'. The author of the Essais, for instance, reproached the Stoics for their haughty attitude towards suffering, their 'too calm and disdainful bearing towards the endurance of evil' (t. II, 37 ). In the sense of permission or concession concerning religious freedom, the word 'tolerance' appears in the second half of the sixteenth century in Germany (Toleranz) and the Low Countries (Tolerantie), and doubtless a little later in France (cf. H. H. Mispelblom Beyer, Tolerantie en Fanatisme, Arnhem, 1948, pp. 4-5, 202-203). The expression 'tolerance of the Reformed' is found in the Histoire univer- selle of Agrippa d'Aubigné (t. II, 25). It appears even before that in a pamphlet of about the same date as the Edict of Nantes ( 1598). In the absence of a noun, the verb 'to tolerate' had been in use for a long time in connection with religious freedom. A whole article in Thomas Aquinas Summa Theologica is devoted to the question: Utrum ritus infidelium sint tolerandi? (IIa IIae, qu. 10, art. 11). During the period of the Reformation Catholic theolo- gians had but to revive St Thomas's terms. Actually the problem of tolerance is usually expressed thus: Can one 'permit' or 'tolerate' two or more religions within a Christian State? At first the word 'permission' was preferred to 'tolerance', which became current later. And the theologians did not fail to specify, as in a defence of the Edict of Amboise ( 1563), that 'Permission is not the same as approval'. So, in spite of a terminology which differed slightly from ours, the theologians and writers of the sixteenth century did in fact treat of the problem of 'tolerance'. The present work has not been inspired by the desire to prove a thesis or to write apologetics. It is a history with no other end in view than to set out, in all their diversity, the reactions of theologians, humanists, and rulers towards a grave issue brought about by the Reformation: religious pluralism within the State and within Christendom. -x- |