trivial as the liberal theorists would have us believe, it would be difficult to understand their resistance to reform and the thousands of pages of print that they have produced to shield those who engage in such language. Issues of racism and sexism in language are not simply matters of political correctness; they are, however, deeply political and, like the concepts of intelli- gence and knowledge, will go a long way toward determining the allocation of privilege, dignity, and even human worth. Those who have traditionally defined such concepts have wielded an enormous power, for we all have a stake in which particular definitions gain acceptance as correct. If we want, like Charles Sanders Peirce ( 1931-1958), to insist that scholarship "not block the way of inquiry" (p. 56, vol. 1, paragraph 1. 135) on such important issues, we must begin by not reducing them to matters of etiquette, but by acknowl- edging their profound impact on all of us. Notes | 1 | I use the term "liberal" because of the emphasis these writers place on the tradi- tional liberal ideal of freedom of expression and academic freedom, as well as their attempt to use the work of John Stuart Mill as justification for their position. In retrospect, I think that "pseudo-liberal" would have been a better term and "neo conservative" better yet. | | | | -214- |