that is to play a particular and useful role in dispute settlement. In this role the Court is prepared to take under its purview disputes that involve significant political aspects, including questions regarding a state's employment of armed force. This does not mean that the Court has abandoned legal issues and has become a political body. Rather, the Court has become more willing to consider and pronounce upon facts and respective legal rights that are enmeshed in controversial and ongoing political disputes between states.
As the Court continues to move in this new direction, it will likely offend some states and please others. The outrage expressed by the Reagan administration with the Court's acceptance of the case brought against the United States by Nicaragua and the subsequent statement by the Legal Adviser announcing the U.S. withdrawal from the optional clause of the Court's Statute reflect a view that challenges the Court's activist approach. It is not clear at the present time how far the Court is prepared to go, or will be able to go without causing a significant number of states to follow the United States and withdraw from the optional clause, in pursuing its activist role. At the same time, it is difficult to comprehend the Court retreating from its activist approach. The Court will, no doubt, attempt to achieve a balance such that it remains an activist tribunal without losing its jurisprudential credibility or legitimacy.
Thomas J. Bodie's work gives us the foundation to confront conventional wisdom about the Court but also, and more importantly, it enables us to appreciate the dynamic and creative forces operating in the international legal system that enable the Court in particular and the rules of international law in general to assume a more visible and important role in the conduct of international relations. These same dynamic forces also make the study of international relations so important and so exciting. We are indebted to him for his contribution to the field of study.
Don C. Piper University of Maryland
-x-
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication Information: Book Title: Politics and the Emergence of an Activist International Court of Justice. Contributors: Thomas J. Bodie - author. Publisher: Praeger Publishers. Place of Publication: Westport, CT. Publication Year: 1995. Page Number: x.
Add a Shared Note
Shared Notes are comments made by Questia users on books,
book pages, or articles that inform other users and enhance
the Questia research community.
This feature allows you to create and manage separate folders for your different research projects. To view markups for a different project, make that project your current project.
This feature allows you to save a link to the publication you are reading or view all the publications you have put on your bookshelf.
This feature allows you to save a link to the page you are reading, which you can later return to from Projects.
This feature allows you to highlight words or phrases on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to save a note you write on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to create a citation to the page you are reading that you can paste into your paper. Highlight a passage to include that passage as a quotation.
This feature allows you to save a reference to a publication you are reading for your bibliography or generate a bibliography you can paste into your paper.
This feature allows you to print the page you are reading,
including your notes or highlights (IE users must have "print background colors and image" setting selected.)
This feature allows you to look up words in encyclopedia.
Questia's powerful research tools allow you to highlight, take notes, bookmark and even create instant citations and bibliographies. To use these features and save hours of work, you must create a Questia account.
Need a Questia account? Sign up for a FREE trial now. Save time, stress and hassle, and get better grades with trusted, online research.