job of being a person, not an announcer. Which is not to say, of course, that just such a display of personhood may not become the mainstay of a radio or TV show.
XI
CONCLUSIONS
Take it that a standard in much broadcasting is that the speaker will render his prepared text with faultless articulation, pronunciation, tempo, and stress, and restrict himself entirely to the copy. He is to appear to us only in the guise that his prepared material has planned for him, almost as though he were to hold himself to the character allotted to him in a play. And whether aloud reading or fresh talk is required of him, he is obliged to compress or stretch his talk so that it lasts exactly as long as the time allotted, just filling up the space between his "on" and "off " cues. Given this ideal, any noticed faultable may not only intro- duce irrelevant associations (if not misinforming us), but also divert the obligatory stream, presenting a view of someone stum- bling--indeed a view of a stumbler--instead of a view of the person who has been programmed for the occasion. Further, remedies themselves necessarily add further diversion, further introducing a difference between what was to have occurred and what is occurring. More to the point, corrective actions can in- trude the speaker upon us in a way we hadn't bargained for: his plight as a speaker of words. Substantive repairs, self-reports, and apologies--remedial acts of all kinds--thrust the person making them upon us in a more rounded and intimate way than the role that was meant to emerge for him might recommend. He becomes fleshier than he was to have been. After all, the very efficacy of an apology is due to its capacity to convince us that the person making it is a somewhat different person from the one who committed the offense in the first place, and how can this evi- dence be presented without deflecting attention from the original text to the announcer in his capacity as animator?
It was argued that announcers on small and on special- interest stations, and announcers employing a comic format, do
-320-
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication Information: Book Title: Forms of Talk. Contributors: Erving Goffman - author. Publisher: University of Pennsylvania Press. Place of Publication: Philadelphia. Publication Year: 1981. Page Number: 320.
Add a Shared Note
Shared Notes are comments made by Questia users on books,
book pages, or articles that inform other users and enhance
the Questia research community.
This feature allows you to create and manage separate folders for your different research projects. To view markups for a different project, make that project your current project.
This feature allows you to save a link to the publication you are reading or view all the publications you have put on your bookshelf.
This feature allows you to save a link to the page you are reading, which you can later return to from Projects.
This feature allows you to highlight words or phrases on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to save a note you write on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to create a citation to the page you are reading that you can paste into your paper. Highlight a passage to include that passage as a quotation.
This feature allows you to save a reference to a publication you are reading for your bibliography or generate a bibliography you can paste into your paper.
This feature allows you to print the page you are reading,
including your notes or highlights (IE users must have "print background colors and image" setting selected.)
This feature allows you to look up words in encyclopedia.
Questia's powerful research tools allow you to highlight, take notes, bookmark and even create instant citations and bibliographies. To use these features and save hours of work, you must create a Questia account.
Need a Questia account? Sign up for a FREE trial now. Save time, stress and hassle, and get better grades with trusted, online research.