Teaching Macroeconomics by the Case Method Stephen G. Marks and Michael G. Rukstad We should teach macroeconomics by the case method. We need not teach cases exclusively. Indeed, we do not advocate abandoning the teaching of theo- ry, of models, of principles. But if we deny students the richness of cases, we do them, and the macroeconomics profession, a great disservice. We do them a dis- service because we withhold knowledge that only cases can convey. We do them a disservice because we withhold skills that most students could use in favor of skills most will never use. We do them a disservice because we present econom- ics as dull, dismal, and lifeless when it demands attention, grabs headlines, and profoundly inspires both our history and our everyday life. These comments reflect impressions and intuitions drawn from our experience teaching by the case method.1 We hope to convince the profession that the meth- od merits studying, researching, and even trying.2 HOW WE CONVEY KNOWLEDGE Often, teachers evaluate pedagogy by referring to principles or rules. (We use the terms principle and rule interchangeably here.) A principle expresses a rela- tionship such as: "If A, then B" or "if and only if A, then B" or "if A, then B with probability P," and so forth. We can express principles in English (or in Russian, for that matter) or mathematically. The Keynesian multiplier, a principle by our definition, says that if government increases spending by X, then national income increase by mX. Particularly compelling principles become laws, such as the law of demand: If price increases by X, then quantity demanded decreases by bX. Can cases teach and illustrate principles? Yes. However, this focus on princi- ples ignores a fundamental feature of cases. Cases convey information about re- lationships that principles cannot. We begin with some noneconomic illustra- tions of this idea. 1. A four-year-old child has just learned a new word, magenta. Suppose the child wants to tell another what magenta means. The child has no principle that, when transmitted to another child, conveys the meaning of magenta. (An adult scientist may describe the color, magenta, in terms of a range of wavelengths of ____________________ | | Stephen G. Marks is a professor of law at Boston University, and Michael G. Rukstad is a visiting associate professor at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia. The authors are grateful to Homer Erekson and two anonymous referees for their comments. | -139- |