people of an empire. African Americans writing in the Colored American, and Pauline Hopkins in particular, both support and oppose imperialist tactics, creating homes that both fall victim to and become victors by these tactics. As an African-American woman, Hopkins may have resisted the violent, male-oriented imperialist practices detailed in the Colored American Maga- zine, yet her formulations of domesticity support counter-invasions none- theless. Even in Of One Blood, where Hopkins associates crossed boundaries with the horror of incest, she is able to point to some, albeit limited, positive possibilities of invasion for black American domestic happiness. What becomes particularly important about the system of domestic im- perialism is that such ambiguity resists the clear demarcation of ruler from ruled within an empire. This stands in contrast to Edward Said's argument that "imperialism acquires a kind of coherence, a set of experiences, and a presence of ruler and ruled alike within the culture" (11). While I would agree with Said that the "idea of having an empire" does indeed infiltrate all aspects of life in an imperial culture, I take exception to the notion that empire necessitates cultural "coherence": with the boundaries of the home changing, domestic imperialism blurs positions of the invaders and the in- vaded, the domestic and the foreign. As such it is a system that resists rein- scribing African Americans into the territory of empire reserved by white American culture for subordination. It refuses simply to fix an African- American space in opposition to white hegemony. Where literary critics such as Claudia Tate and Ann duCille find African-American writers at- tempting to establish happy nuclear families for themselves, I would argue that in the writings in and around the Colored American Magazine, such a space does not seem fully desirable. Instead, the ability to reformulate boundaries and borders in the light of political anxieties fuels the desire behind these narratives. The resulting indeterminacy of the invaded/invad- ing African-American home--familial, national, and international--is threat- ening and liberating. Notes For their help with this essay, I would like to thank Dale Bauer, Dawn Keetley, Susan Dunn, and Liz Cannon. | 1. | See, for example, Claudia Tate, who argues in Domestic Allegories of Political Desire that Hopkins uses the conventions of the domestic novel--in particular the narrative drive toward marriage--in an attempt to create a racialized ideal family | | | | | | (11). Similarly, Ann duCille explores Hopkins's use of the "coupling convention"-- that is, the narrative desire for romantic relationships--in her fiction. Jane Campbell asserts that Contending Forces, in particular, abounds with "the trappings of domes- | | | | -222- |