Your search for: voegelin

This collection of letters exchanged between Robert B. Heilman and Eric Voegelin records a friendship that lasted more than forty years. These scholars, both giants in their own fields, shared news of family and events, academic gossip, personal and professional vicissitudes, academic successes ...

This collection of letters exchanged between Robert B. Heilman and Eric Voegelin records a friendship that lasted more than forty years. These scholars, both giants in their own fields, shared news of family and events, academic gossip, personal and professional vicissitudes, academic successes, and, most important, ideas. Heilman and Voegelin first became acquainted around 1942, when Voegelin delivered a guest lecture for the political science department at Louisiana State University. At that time, Heilman was teaching in the English department at LSU along with Robert Penn Warren and Cleanth Brooks. What started as simple exchanges soon grew into full-fledged correspondence--beginning with an eight-page letter by Voegelin commenting on Heilman's manuscript on Shakespeare's King Lear. Their correspondence lasted until four months before Voegelin's death in 1985. These letters represent Voegelin's most prolonged correspondence conducted in English with an American and provide readers with an insight into Voegelin as a literary critic. While Voegelin's analysis of Henry James's The Turn of the Screw is well known, these letters reveal the source and genesis of the essay. Additional comments by Voegelin on Mann, Eliot, Shakespeare, Homer, Orwell, Flaubert, and other significant writers are uncovered throughout his exchanges with Heilman. Readers will appreciate Heilman's effort to clarify for himself the exact meaning of Voegelin's ideas. Heilman's questions are often questions that readers of Voegelin continue to ask themselves. In the letters, Heilman reveals himself to have a canny perception of the philosophical matters under discussion between the two. Heilman's letters exhibit theelegant writing style for which he was renowned. They differ from his correspondence with other academics in that his exchanges with Voegelin were sustained over a longer period of time and cover a broader array of topics. Th

This important new work is a major analysis of the foundation of Eric Voegelin's political science. Barry Cooper maintains that the writings Voegelin undertook in the 1940s provide the groundwork for the brilliant book that is one of his best known, The New Science of Politics. At the time of that ...

This important new work is a major analysis of the foundation of Eric Voegelin's political science. Barry Cooper maintains that the writings Voegelin undertook in the 1940s provide the groundwork for the brilliant book that is one of his best known, The New Science of Politics. At the time of that book's publication, however, few were aware of the enormous knowledge & accomplished scholarship that lay behind its illuminating, although sometimes baffling, formulations. By focusing on several of the key chapters in Voegelin's eight-volume History of Political Ideas, especially the studies of Bodin, Vico, & Schelling, Cooper shows how those studies provide the basis for Voegelin's thought. Investigating Voegelin's study of oriental influences on Western political "ideas," especially Mongol constitutional law, & his study of Toynbee, Cooper seeks to demonstrate the vast range of materials Voegelin used. Cooper contends that, as with other great thinkers, political crisis, specifically the world war of 1939-1945, stimulated Voegelin's intellectual & spiritual achievement. He provides an analysis of Voegelin's immediate concern with the course of World War II, his ability to understand those dramatic events in a large context, & his ability to provide an insightful account of the causes, the significance, & the consequences of the spiritual & political disorder that was evident all around him. In Eric Voegelin & the Foundations of Modern Political Science, Cooper makes the connection between Voegelin's political writings of the 1940s & the meditative interpretations that began to appear with the publication of Anamnesis & with the later volumes of Order & History much more intelligible than does any existing discussion of Voegelin. Scholars in intellectual history & political science will benefit enormously from this valuable new addition to Voegelin studies.