Bumpy Road for Science

Article excerpt

Byline: Henry I. Miller,, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

"The American people voted for change and they voted for Democrats to take our country in a new direction," said a triumphant Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the California Democrat poised to become speaker of the House. This might turn out to be a case of being careful what you wish for, lest it come true.

Not only is Mrs. Pelosi herself radical, but many of the powerful Democratic committee chairmen-in-waiting are members in good standing of what long-time, bipartisan presidential adviser David Gergen has called the "loony left."

Much of American commerce that depends on innovative science and technology will likely suffer in the new regime. From my days as an official at the Food and Drug Administration during the '80s and early '90s when the Democrats were in the congressional majority, I recall the incessant, uninformed and highly politicized meddling by prominent members of Congress. They did incalculable damage to science and technology and their regulation. And they're baaack.

A few examples:

In 1989, Sen. Patrick Leahy, Vermont Democrat, then-chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, complained to the FDA commissioner about the agency's supposedly too-cavalier, insufficiently rigorous review of an important veterinary drug called bovine somatotropin, or bST, which boosts the milk production of dairy cows. Soon thereafter, he and other members of Congress asked the General Accounting Office to conduct a study of the agency's bST review process. Mr. Leahy even expressed concern that it would be so effective that it could challenge the federal price support system.

Rep. John Conyers, Michigan Democrat, then-chairman of the House Government Operations Committee, joined with Mr. Leahy to pressure the FDA not to approve bST, raising scientifically implausible concerns about the product's safety.

All these concerns about bST were baseless. The drug underwent one of the most lengthy and comprehensive regulatory reviews in history. Used widely, successfully and safely for two decades, it markedly increases productivity: Farmers can produce the same amount of milk with fewer cows and milking machines, less barn space and fewer veterinarian visits, vaccines and so on. But Mr. Conyers has continued his mindless crusade, endorsing an anti-bST book as recently as this year.

Largely as a result of the misguided efforts and bullying of Messrs. Leahy and Conyers and regulators' fear of the two powerful congressmen the FDA's review of this excellent veterinary drug took nine years, while the evaluation of an almost identical product for injection into growth hormone-deficient children took a mere 18 months.

Mr. Leahy is now slated to become the chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, while Mr. …