Books Reveal Human Cost of Capital Punishment

Article excerpt

Could the death penalty be dying? Have we had enough of the five methods of state-sanctioned killing: hanging, shooting, gassing, drugging and electrocuting? Are we finally agreeing with Harry Blackmun, who, before retiring from the Supreme Court in 1994, said that the death penalty should be unconstitutional in all cases?

If the careful and broad research offered by Richard A. Stack, Susannah Sheffer and Joseph B. Ingle is given the wide audience that it surely merits, the answer would be yes. A tailwind of politics, morality and limited prosecutorial budgets is already pushing much of the country in that direction, if the recent abolition of capital punishment in six states (New York, New Jersey, New Mexico, Illinois, Connecticut and Maryland) means anything. Internationally, more than two-thirds of the world's governments don't execute.

When France stopped in the 1980s, one of its two guillotines went to the French museum. The spare was put up for auction, the highest bidder being a Texas millionaire who wanted it for his game room.

Stack, a seasoned lawyer, a longtime professor in the School of Communication at American University and author of the earlier work Dead Wrong: Violence, Vengeance and the Victims of Capital Punishment, takes readers into the lives of 18 inmates who were executed despite persistent doubts about their guilt and consistent evidence to prove innocence.

Even if that were not the case, it would be still be plausible to believe that out of the 1,320 executions since 1976, at least a certain percentage were wrongfully or maliciously convicted. One percent? Two percent? Three percent? Can we be so certain that when it comes to capital punishment, states have been absolutely correct and wholly infallible, when bungling, incompetence and corruption are common in all other exercises of governmental power?

If anything, the 18 cases profiled here seem like a low number when put up against the 140 people who have been freed from death row, their exonerations based on everything from DNA to prosecutorial deceits. The execution of the innocent (whether they were certainly or mostly likely innocent) gives substance to Stack's argument that "because human beings make mistakes, capital punishment results in deadly errors."

The enduring value of Grave Injustice is enhanced by the inclusion of six death penalty abolitionists, those Stack hails as "people I admire and who inspire me." The list, as he admits, is arbitrary. If another half-dozen could have been profiled, I'd suggest Vicki Schieber, Kerry Kennedy, Joseph Giarratano, Richard Dieter, and Charles and Pauline Sullivan, all tireless in their mission to end death chamber violence.

And one more: Sheffer. What drew her to research and write Fighting for Their Lives was curiosity Having worked for 15 years in the field of death penalty abolition, including directing Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights, she had questions about that small band of defense lawyers involved in capital cases (specifically post-conviction lawyers).

What draws them to this lonely, high-stakes kind of practice? What are their emotions as the end draws near for their clients, whom they come to know as human beings, not stereotyped monsters? How do they carry on defying the odds and the state?

Unlike pre-conviction trial lawyers, who are often court-appointed and who may lack the energy, interest or knowledge to serve their clients well, those who work for the condemned are fully aware that, as Sheffer writes, "overturning a death sentence is much harder than preventing it from being handed down in the first place. …