Should the European Central Bank Change Its Two Percent Inflation Ceiling? (A Symposium of Views)

Article excerpt

The European Central Bank has established an inflation ceiling of two percent. As a result, the central bank in the view of some has been slow to reduce short-term interest rates despite economic sluggishness in many of the larger European economies. Given present conditions, would you keep the targeted ceiling at its current rate? If so, would you have some temporary exceptions such as for special shocks (price of oil, etc.)? To what extent does a lot of the current inflationary pressure relate to structural impediments including labor market rigidities ? Is the two percent ceiling a meaningful benchmark in a situation where, despite short-term inflationary pressures, a different policy mix might lead to improvements in the long run for a stronger economy ? Or is the current arrangement quite appropriate?

No way! Leave it as is!


Nobel Laureate in Economics, 1976 Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution

I vote for leaving the ECB's targeted ceiling as it is. Changing the target will be the first step toward altering completely the role and function of the ECB. A bout of inflation now might temporarily reduce unemployment, but unless labor market rigidities are eliminated, it will soon be time to raise the target once again. A slippery slope indeed. Fine-tuning to a fare-thee-well.

Up it to 3 percent.


Senior Fellow Institute for International Economics

The ECB should change its inflation ceiling to 3 percent and adopt inflation targeting with a range of 1-3 percent. The current ECB policy framework has confused the market and policymakers. The ECB has undermined credibility by appropriately, but inelegantly, ignoring the ceiling of 2 percent, defining price stability. Although Euroland desperately needs structural supply-side reforms, its sluggish economic performance is also caused by inadequate demand. Finally, the inflation risk associated with an easier monetary policy is small, and it can easily be reversed; an easier fiscal stance is more difficult to reverse.

Leave it!


Former President, Deutsche Bundesbank

My short answer is, "Leave the ECB's target ceiling as it is." My arguments are: It is a ceiling for a medium time horizon, not really a target. In other words, price increases lower than 2 percent annually can be tolerated as well as short-term overshooting. Certainly this is an ambitious target.

One must consider the European Monetary Union is only a creation in the framework of the European Community which is an association of states, not one state; it has not one government but fifteen. And some countries have had a history of high inflation with more than 5 percent inflation in the 1990s, and some have had double-digit rates in the decades before. Therefore, price stability must be a priority target of the ECB.

I feel the critics of the ECB's policy do not really accept differences of monetary policy between the monetary union and on a national basis. They argue as if the euro is an old national currency. But as a currency, it is only four years old and as a common cash, only ten months. It works well in the framework of its task but a fine-tuning of the twelve economies is not its target, and cannot be its target.

Yes, but be precise.


Allan H. Meltzer University Professor, Carnegie Mellon University, and Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute

Of course, the ECB should keep its policy target unchanged. What point would there be to having a role-like policy and an announced target, if the bank accommodated political pressures and shortcomings as it is now urged to do? While not particularly relevant currently, the ECB, and every other central bank, should be precise about whether its definition of inflation includes onetime shocks to the price level, such as changes in VAT, oil prices, and the productivity level. …