Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

Synopsis

In its 1993 Daubert decision, the United States Supreme Court clarified the standards judges should use in deciding whether to admit expert evidence into federal cases. This study examines how judges have changed the way they evaluate expert evidence since Daubert and how the parties proposing and challenging evidence have responded as a result.
Author Advanced search

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.