This book asks how federal court judges decide cases when faced with unsettled issues of law. Specifically, how much and why are their decisions influenced by higher court judges or other judges at the same level as themselves? To answer these questions, the author relies on statistical analyses of decisions and interviews with court of appeals judges. The key findings are that judges give serious attention to the work of colleagues of equal authority, but demonstrate substantial independence from the Supreme Court.
Related books and articles
Courts, Liberalism, and Rights: Gay Law and Politics in the United States and Canada By Jason Pierceson Temple University Press, 2005
Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals By Frank B. Cross Stanford University Press, 2007
Procedural Due Process: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution By Rhonda Wasserman Praeger, 2004
Improving the Appellate Process Worldwide through Maximizing Judicial Resources By Wallace, J. Clifford Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 38, No. 1, January 2005
A Comparison of the Criminal Appellate Decisions of Appointed State Supreme Courts: Insights, Questions, and Implications for Judicial Independence By McLeod, Aman L. Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, January 2007
NAVIGATING JUDICIAL SELECTION: New Judges Speak about the Process and Its Impact on Judicial Diversity By Merola, Linda M. Gould, Jon B. Judicature, Vol. 93, No. 5, March/April 2010
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Appellate Nominee Pryor Pledged to Defy Courts, Ex-Gov Says in Affidavit By Church & State, Vol. 56, No. 11, December 2003
Shakedown: How Corporations, Government, and Trial Lawyers Abuse the Judicial Process By Leef, George C. Freeman, Vol. 55, No. 8, October 2005
You Be the Judge: Courthouse Security Gets Spotlighted by the Media after an Incident Occurs, but Are Courts Making Sure That Security Shines Even When Reporters Aren't Looking? By Davidson, Mary Alice Security Management, Vol. 50, No. 10, October 2006
Islamic Court Convicts 10 Iranian Jews of Spying for Israel Clinton Decries 'Seriously Flawed' Judicial Process By The Florida Times Union, July 2, 2000
Texas Forced to Reconsider Judicial Election Process US Supreme Court Ruled That, by Choosing Judges by Ballot, the State Violates the Federal Voting Rights Act By Julie Blase, The Christian Science Monitor, June 27, 1991
Should the 9th Circuit Be Split? Congress Considers Dividing the Appellate Court By Tobias, Carl The Washington Times (Washington, DC), December 30, 2005