After Method: Mess in Social Science Research

After Method: Mess in Social Science Research

After Method: Mess in Social Science Research

After Method: Mess in Social Science Research

Synopsis

John Law argues that methods don't just describe social realities but are also involved in creating them. The implications of this argument are highly significant. If this is the case, methods are always political, and it raises the question of what kinds of social realities we want to create. Most current methods look for clarity and precision. It is usually said that only poor research produces messy findings, and the idea that things in the world might be fluid, elusive, or multiple is unthinkable. Law's startling argument is that this is wrong and it is time for a new approach. Many realities, he says, are vague and ephemeral. If methods want to know and help to shape the world, then they need to reinvent themselves and their politics to deal with mess. That is the challenge. Nothing less will do.

Excerpt

If this is an awful mess … then would something less messy make a mess of describing it?

'There is no use in trying, ' said Alice; 'one can't believe impossible things.' 'I dare say you haven't had much practice, ' said the Queen. 'When I was your age, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.'

(Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland) . . .

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.