Bad Language: Are Some Words Better than Others?

Bad Language: Are Some Words Better than Others?

Bad Language: Are Some Words Better than Others?

Bad Language: Are Some Words Better than Others?

Synopsis

Is today's language at an all-time low? Are pronunciations likecawfeeandchawklitbad English? Is slang likemy badorhook upimproper? Is it incorrect to mix English and Spanish, as inYo quiero Taco Bell? Can you write Who do you trust? rather than Whom do you trust? Linguist Edwin Battistella takes a hard look at traditional notions of bad language, arguing that they are often based in sterile conventionality.

Examining grammar and style, cursing, slang, and political correctness, regional and ethnic dialects, and foreign accents and language mixing, Battistella discusses the strong feelings evoked by language variation, from objections to the pronunciationNU-cu-larto complaints about bilingual education. He explains the natural desire for uniformity in writing and speaking and traces the association of mainstream norms to ideas about refinement, intelligence, education, character, national unity and political values. Battistella argues that none of these qualities is inherently connected to language.

It is tempting but wrong, Battistella argues, to think of slang, dialects and nonstandard grammar as simply breaking the rules of good English. Instead, we should view language as made up of alternative forms of orderliness adopted by speakers depending on their purpose. Thus we can study the structure and context of nonstandard language in order to illuminate and enrich traditional forms of language, and make policy decisions based on an informed engagement.

Re-examining longstanding and heated debates,Bad Languagewill appeal to a wide spectrum of readers engaged and interested in the debate over what constitutes proper language.

Excerpt

I don’t want to talk no grammar. I want to talk like a lady.

—Eliza Doolittle

Like many linguists, I have wrestled for years with the issue of Standard English. How do I reconcile the fact that language change is natural and inevitable with the more visceral feeling that some usage bothers me personally? Certain changes I resist. Others I embrace. As an occasional teacher of writing, I have a more difficult problem. I recognize that many traditional rules of grammar and exposition are essentially arbitrary. Yet I often continue to teach them because they are expected. This is perhaps socially justified, but the contradiction undermines the teaching enterprise.

For those who reflect on language, other troubling contradictions arise as well. Offensive or vulgar speech is one such language problem.

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.