Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research Has to Say
Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research Has to Say
Synopsis
Excerpt
As well as planning schemes of work and teaching lessons, teachers need to monitor students' learning. Formative assessment is the obvious means of providing students with feedback to improve their performance. The term 'formative assessment' does not have a tightly defined and widely accepted meaning. In this chapter it is interpreted as encompassing all those activities, undertaken by teachers, and/or by their students, which provide information to be used as feedback to modify the teaching and learning activities in which they are engaged.
This chapter is based on a recent review of the research evidence on formative assessment (Black and Wiliam 1998a). The first of the three main sections will discuss some aspects of the research evidence that indicate guidelines for improving classroom practice. The second discusses research evidence about the quality of such practice. The third section then discusses the implications for practice which follow from the evidence.
Features of research on formative assessment
Evidence of success
From the literature published since 1986, it is possible to select at least 20 studies which describe how the effects of formative assessment have been tested by quantitative experimental-control comparisons. All of these studies show that innovations which strengthen the practice of formative assessment produce significant learning gains. These studies range over all ages (from 5-year-olds to university undergraduates), across several school subjects, and over several countries. The experimental outcomes are reported in . . .