Critical Thinking for Addiction Professionals

Critical Thinking for Addiction Professionals

Critical Thinking for Addiction Professionals

Critical Thinking for Addiction Professionals

Synopsis

""Dr. Taleff has provided an insightful analysis of the kinds of thinking errors often made by counselors. The text should be required reading in all areas of health and human services. The concepts and discussion are as valuable to experienced helpers as they are to novices.""

-Gregory Blevins, Ph. D., Professor, Governors State University Readers learn:"" To evaluate their critical thinking abilities"" The characteristics of a critical thinking professional"" What drives bad thinking in addiction work"" How to recognize and avoid thinking fallacies"" The ethics and consequences of using critical thinking

Thinking flaws, which often result from myths and generalizations in the field of therapy, are common not just in counselors, but in supervisors and administrators. This user-friendly guide, presented by critical thinking expert and addiction professional Dr. Michael J. Taleff, is the first to bring together critical thinking and addiction work. Taleff offers readers the tools they need to think critically and make better decisions.

Excerpt

Bill, a well-meaning and experienced addiction counselor for fifteen years, has just walked out of a typical addiction counseling session. He believes he did a good job but actually, he made a number of mistakes, and he doesn't even know it. the mistakes he made were linked to critical thinking errors he often commits. Those errors, in turn, led him to recommend a set of bad clinical decisions for his client.

Now, Bill is a fairly bright guy. He is certified in his state, and has received good evaluations from his supervisor. He trusts that he thinks well, but sometimes, he doesn't. For example, in the case he just left, Bill assessed his client as having a significant alcohol problem, based on only one symptom. Bill then jumped to a clinical decision that sent the client to an intensive inpatient program. the more appropriate approach would have been to conduct further evaluations, contact individuals (family members, employer, etc.) to gather additional information, and then make a clinical decision as to treatment.

Decisions like this happen all the time because flawed thinking leads to erroneous conclusions. This is only one part of the critical thinking problem in the addiction field. the same thinking errors happen at the supervisory and administrative levels. That is, supervisors and administrators make the same kinds of generalizing mistakes by jumping to conclusions before investigating reasonable options.

Another area of the addiction field has similar problems. For example, I have attended numerous workshops and conferences and have read many addiction books over the years. Walking out . . .

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.