(Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations

(Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations

(Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations

(Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations

Synopsis

This book seeks to explain two core paradoxes associated with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): How have diverse states hung together and stabilized relations in the face of competing interests, divergent preferences, and arguably weak cooperation? How has a group of lesser, self-identified Southeast Asian powers gone beyond its original regional purview to shape the form and content of Asian Pacific and East Asian regionalisms?

According to Alice Ba, the answers lie in ASEAN's founding arguments: arguments that were premised on an assumed regional disunity. She demonstrates how these arguments draw critical causal connections that make Southeast Asian regionalism a necessary response to problems, give rise to its defining informality and consensus-seeking process, and also constrain ASEAN's regionalism. Tracing debates about ASEAN's intra- and extra-regional relations over four decades, she argues for a process-driven view of cooperation, sheds light on intervening processes of argument and debate, and highlights interacting material, ideational, and social forces in the construction of regions and regionalisms.

Excerpt

The ASEAN states have only three things in common:
karaoke, durian, and golf.

Popular ASEAN saying

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has long posed a puzzle for the study of international relations. On the one hand, states are often divided among themselves; economic interests are more competitive than complementary; unilateralism, as often as not, seems to trump multilateralism. In fact, the open-endedness of past initiatives and the often frustratingly slow pace of ASEAN cooperation have given rise to a common characterization of ASEAN as a “talk shop”—all talk, no action. ASEAN’s difficulties and challenges in responding to recent crises—most notably, the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the 2003 SARS crisis, Myanmar, and the recurring environmental haze caused by yearly fires in Indonesia—not to mention recent difficulties in approving a new ASEAN charter seem to further confirm the particular problems of intra-ASEAN coordination.

On the other hand, ASEAN is associated with the transformation of the once volatile and fragmented region that was Southeast Asia. If ASEAN is viewed by many as a “weak” case of regional cooperation, ASEAN’s creation in 1967 may be just as widely viewed by others as marking an important turning point in the international relations of Southeast Asia. By this view, with ASEAN’s creation, an era marked by highly confrontational politics gave way to a new one characterized by more stable relations and growing cooperation.

In fact, Southeast Asia’s economic dynamism, relative stability, and regional initiatives make it easy to forget just how fragile both region and its relations were forty years ago. At the time of ASEAN’s founding, conflict and division plagued practically every level of politics. The newness of most states and the legacies of arbitrarily drawn colonial borders practically assured that domestic development in Southeast Asia would be a volatile process. Nor were Southeast Asia’s international politics any more stable. At the global level, states found themselves the targets and tools of major power interventions and Cold War designs. At the regional level . . .

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.