Members of the Supreme Court are supposed to base decisions on the law, but often their choices are better explained by political ideology and party loyalty. Roberts sheds light on this problem by looking at a part of the Court's life that has never been systematically studied. Most cases feature extra briefs written by third parties known as amici curiae. He examines the rare occasions on which the Court allows these extra groups to participate not just by filing briefs but by appearing before the Court during oral arguments. By tracing how these groups influence the justices' behavior, Roberts presents a strong case that the Court is driven by more than politics.
Related books and articles
The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court By Pamela C. Corley; Amy Steigerwalt; Artemus Ward Stanford Law Books, 2013
Losing Twice: Harms of Indifference in the Supreme Court By Emily M. Calhoun Oxford University Press, 2011
Amici Curiae in Investor-State Arbitrations: Two Recent Decisions By Bastin, Lucas Australian International Law Journal, Vol. 20, Annual 2013PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICALPeer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
WHO Participates as Amici Curiae in the U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS? By Collins, Paul M. Martinek, Wendy L. Judicature, Vol. 94, No. 3, November/December 2010PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICALPeer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Brief for Natural Resources Defense Council as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondent, United States V. Atlantic Research Corp., No. 06-562 (U.S. Apr. 5, 2007) By Johnston, Craig Environmental Law, Vol. 37, No. 2, Spring 2007
Immigrants' Groups Condemn Supreme Court Decision By C, Delinda Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Vol. XIII, No. 4, June 3, 1999
Supreme Court Decision Upholds Clean Air Act By Kocheisen, Carol Nation's Cities Weekly, Vol. 24, No. 9, March 5, 2001
Grapes in Chains: A Supreme Court Decision in May 2005 Was Supposed to Liberate Sales from Vineyards to Wine Lovers. It Didn't. but Even Now, If You Live in Certain States, You Can Bypass the Middlemen and Get Some Great Wine by Mail By Cortese, Amy The American (Washington, DC), Vol. 1, No. 2, January-February 2007
Supreme Court Decision Shows No Misgivings over Capital Punishment/judges Call Question of Racial Bias 'A Potentially Irrelevant Factor' By Thomas Wicker, Ny Times THE JOURNAL RECORD, May 2, 1987
Supreme Court Decision on EO 464; (Conclusion) By Manila Bulletin, April 25, 2006
Diocese Marches in D.C. Area Catholics Join Protest of U.S. Supreme Court's Decision on Abortion By Evansville Courier & Press (2007-Current), January 24, 2012