To Acknowledge a War: The Korean War in American Memory

To Acknowledge a War: The Korean War in American Memory

To Acknowledge a War: The Korean War in American Memory

To Acknowledge a War: The Korean War in American Memory


Historians often refer to the Korean War as "the forgotten war," but Edwards argues that in many respects it is a conflict that has been deliberately ignored for the past fifty years. This broad look at the war examines how Americans have attempted to remember and commemorate the confrontation which played such a major role in America's Cold War experience. As a United Nations effort or Police Action, the hazy identification of the war has in part contributed to a lack of public understanding of what happened in Korea. This book considers the American response to the "loss" in Korea, and how this response played out as a failure to remember.


The war was a defining event in the long peace between the Soviet Union and the United States.

William Stueck

War is about fighting, and killing, and dying. While the field of battle is often a place of heroes and honor, wars are not heroic nor do nations engaged in war act honorably. War is an aspect of human life that has been with us since men and women first decided to record their past, and probably long before. Fighting seems to be as much a part of the human condition as is love. Many feel that the condition of war is a natural state. There may be some truth in this idea. The difficulty in understanding war as phenomenon is compounded by the fact that while killing may be natural, it does not necessarily follow that war is. The desire to kill appears to be conditioned; is the willingness to kill more the product of rational consideration?

There is still considerable disagreement concerning the methods by which the figures of combat firing are collected. But there appears to be general agreement about what they suggest. S. L. A. Marshall provided most of these figures. During the fighting in World War II, only 15 percent to 20 percent of those on the line actually fired their weapons. In Korea, it is suggested that something like 45 percent of the infantry engaged actually shot their weapons with the intent to kill. But in Vietnam, the percentage of those firing their weapons rose to nearly 90 percent. Without jumping to too many conclusions, it does seem clear that the circumstances, the conditioning, or perhaps the natural reluctance to kill, has changed. More and more American men and women are willing to kill when in combat.

The jury is still out about which came first; violence and then conditioned behavior, or conditioned behavior and then violence. But one thing is clear. While the military has been fairly successful in conditioning young men and women to kill, they have made little or no effort--nor has anyone else--to recondition those who were taught to act on impulse rather than reason.

It is in part this conditioning to the act of killing, and the desire to control . . .

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.