A fresh and provocative perspective on the judicial process and the transmission of ideas into law. Professors McIntosh and Cates demonstrate, through the actions and writings of such diverse jurists as Louis Brandeis, Sandra Day O'Connor, Jerome Frank, and Hans Linde, how judges' pet intellectual projects become the fodder for new ideas in the law.
Related books and articles
Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals By David E. Klein Cambridge University Press, 2002
Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior By Lawrence Baum Princeton University Press, 2006
Judicial Power in a Federal System: Canada, United States and Germany By Cristina M. Ruggiero LFB Scholarly, 2012
NAVIGATING JUDICIAL SELECTION: New Judges Speak about the Process and Its Impact on Judicial Diversity By Merola, Linda M. Gould, Jon B. Judicature, Vol. 93, No. 5, March/April 2010
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Wyoming's Judicial Selection Process: Is It Getting the Job Done? By Kite, Marilyn S. Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, January 2007
Restoring Our Broken Judicial Confirmation Process By Cornyn, John Texas Review of Law & Politics, Vol. 8, No. 1, Fall 2003
Shakedown: How Corporations, Government, and Trial Lawyers Abuse the Judicial Process By Leef, George C. Freeman, Vol. 55, No. 8, October 2005
Unleash the Judges: The Libertarian Case for Judicial Activism By Root, Damon W. Reason, Vol. 37, No. 3, July 2005
Court Rise, Enter Your Honours! ICC Judges Are Appointed Not Because They Are the Best Legal Minds in the World, but Because of Backroom Vote Trading. as Dr David Hoile Reports, Some of Them Have Had No Legal Training or Judicial Experience at All By Hoile, David New African, No. 515, March 2012
Texas Forced to Reconsider Judicial Election Process US Supreme Court Ruled That, by Choosing Judges by Ballot, the State Violates the Federal Voting Rights Act By Julie Blase, The Christian Science Monitor, June 27, 1991
Islamic Court Convicts 10 Iranian Jews of Spying for Israel Clinton Decries 'Seriously Flawed' Judicial Process By The Florida Times Union, July 2, 2000
Wrongful Conviction in Canada Stokes Judicial Review $6.85 Million Award Given David Milgaard. Appeals Process Now Under By Ruth Walker, writer of The Christian Science Monitor The Christian Science Monitor, May 24, 1999