The Gatekeepers of Psychology: Evaluation of Peer Review by Case History


This book is a wake-up call for those who contend that the peer review system for journal publications works. It supports the current groundswell of dissatisfaction with peer review. Harcum and Rosen challenge the notion of simple biases of researchers and argue that many reviews are simply incompetent. The biases against new scientific approaches and philosophies are exacerbated if proposed by unknown researchers or if contrary to the established research stars. The authors also destroy the myth of the appeal system as a forum whereby peers can debate scientific issues.

Additional information

Publisher: Place of publication:
  • Westport, CT
Publication year:
  • 1993


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.