The federal courts, believes Braveman, are being systematically closed to individuals challenging the constitutionality of the conduct of state officials. Debate over the role of the federal court system in upholding constitutional rights is not new to readers of law journals and scholarly articles, but is here made accessible to the general public. Braveman gives a historical overview of the emergence of the federal courts as the guardian of constitutional rights, and focuses on specific cases and doctrines to illustrate a radical change in our judicial philosophy.
Related books and articles
Constitutional Remedies: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution By Michael L. Wells; Thomas A. Eaton Praeger, 2002
The Justices of the United States Supreme Court: Their Lives and Major Opinions - Vol. 2 By Leon Friedman; Fred L. Israel Chelsea House, 1997
The Supreme Court of the United States: A Student Companion By John J. Patrick Oxford University Press, 2001
Federal Employees, Torts, and the Westfall Act of 1988 By Lee, Robert D., Jr. Public Administration Review, Vol. 56, No. 4, July-August 1996
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Takings, Torts and Turmoil: Reviewing the Authority Requirement of the Just Compensation Clause By Silversmith, Jed Michael UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Vol. 19, No. 2, Winter 2001
Insurance Coverage of Claims Alleging Constitutional Torts: It's a Right By Kazanjian, John H. Public Management, Vol. 79, No. 3, March 1997
The Real Problem with Kelo: By Intervening without Jurisdiction in a State-Level Eminent Domain Case, the U.S. Supreme Court Has Imperiled Property Rights Nationwide By Kirkwood, R. Cort The New American, Vol. 21, No. 15, July 25, 2005
Understanding the Challenges Facing a Supreme Court Justice By Salvato, Nancy The World and I, Vol. 24, No. 9, September 2009
Obama Administration Claims a Right to Hide Evidence before Supreme Court By Kyndra Miller Rotunda Rear Admiral James Carey Bob Carey Joshua Flynn-Brown Examiner (Washington, D.C.), The, December 10, 2014
A Terror Ruling's Impact on Refugees ; the Supreme Court's Ruling on Guantanamo Detainees May Have Implications for Haitian and Cuban Refugees By Warren Richey writer of The Christian Science Monitor The Christian Science Monitor, July 29, 2004