This vital study offers a new interpretation of Hume's famous "Of Miracles," which notoriously argues against the possibility of miracles. By situating Hume's popular argument in the context of the 18th century debate on miracles, Earman shows Hume's argument to be largely unoriginal and chiefly without merit where it is original. Yet Earman constructively conceives how progress can be made on the issues that Hume's essay so provocatively posed about the ability of eyewitness testimony to establish the credibility of marvelous and miraculous events.
Related books and articles
A Defense of Hume on Miracles By Robert J. Fogelin Princeton University Press, 2003
In Defense of Miracles: A Comprehensive Case for God's Action in History By Michener, Ronald T. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Vol. 43, No. 4, December 2000
Miracles in Enlightenment England By Ingram, Robert G. Anglican and Episcopal History, Vol. 76, No. 4, December 2007
Two Essays on Biblical and on Ecclesiastical Miracles By Ker, Ian The Catholic Historical Review, Vol. 98, No. 1, January 2012PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICALPeer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
The Immortal David Hume (1711-1776) By Bruce, Nigel Free Inquiry, Vol. 17, No. 1, Winter 1996
Miracles and Modern Minds, Part Two By Meier, John P. The Catholic World, Vol. 238, No. 1424, March-April 1995
Miracles Happen, but Don't Sit and Wait for Them By Santangelo, Al New Haven Register (New Haven, CT), August 11, 2012