Race and Ethnic Conflict: Contending Views on Prejudice, Discrimination, and Ethnoviolence

Race and Ethnic Conflict: Contending Views on Prejudice, Discrimination, and Ethnoviolence

Race and Ethnic Conflict: Contending Views on Prejudice, Discrimination, and Ethnoviolence

Race and Ethnic Conflict: Contending Views on Prejudice, Discrimination, and Ethnoviolence


In the revised and updated second edition of this comprehensive book, the first anthology to integrate social-psychological literature on prejudice with sociological and historical investigations, contributors introduce readers to the key debates and principal writings on racial and ethnic conflict, representing conservative, liberal, and radical positions. Presented in debate format, each section offers a provocative discussion of contemporary problems and issues, allowing students to take part in the controversies from an informed perspective. The editors' introductions provide current data and describe cutting-edge arguments that are reshaping the study of race and ethnicity today. The second edition boasts new readings which serve to further enhance the dialogue on America's continuing struggle with racial issues. Contributors tackle a wide array of issues which plague the country today- from discrimination and immigration to education and politics- and ask how we can affect change as we move into the twenty-first century.


Much has happened in the area of race and ethnic relations since the first edition of our book was published in 1994. The changes in this edition reflect the changes in society and the writing about it.

We begin this book by summarizing our own observations. The first is that prejudice and discrimination against racial/ethnic groups in American society is still a serious problem. In spite of considerable civil rights legislation and government programs intended to minimize inequality, white Americans still have greater op- portunities than all others. Discrimination persists; group tensions are on the rise.

The second observation is that there has been a change in the dominant mode of expression of prejudice. The ethnic group stereotypes of an earlier day were rooted in beliefs about the biological differences among people. Today, there is no longer a widespread or strongly held sense of biological inferiority. There is, rather, a sense of "cultural" difference. So, for example, minority groups are not rejected because they are seen as innately inferior but because their "lifestyle" is unacceptable. Further, the stereotypes of an earlier day were far more hateful and far more cruel than those of today. Today one seldom encounters people who regard the Japanese as cruel, sly, and treacherous or who fear Jews because they kidnap young children for ritual blood sacrifices. Fewer people today accept the gross, negative ethnic group stereotypes than at the time of the civil rights movement.

Third, there has been a reduction in the amount of discrimination. Changes have occurred in the motivation of people to discriminate against others in everyday settings. In public accommodations, in schools and in workplaces, in voting and political officeholding, major improvements have occurred in this society. To be sure, neighborhood segregation persists in almost all cities and has gotten worse in many. School segregation continues, although it is based more on residential patterns than on legal mandates. Intergroup friendships that cross ethnic and racial lines are still not as frequent as intragroup friendships. Although the prevailing social norms still prescribe considerable social distance between many ethnically different people in intimate settings, much less distance is prescribed in public and casual settings. This, too, is a major change in norms from the period of the civil rights movement. Remember that the civil rights struggles of the 1950s began over issues of where to sit in a bus or at a lunch counter. Public transportation and restaurants are now open to all. Barriers to participation in electoral politics have mainly been removed.

The fourth observation is that the level of violence motivated by prejudice is high and has been increasing through the 1980s and 1990s. This form of violence, which . . .

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.