The book's primary aim is to determine whether Canada and the United States have become more similar as their economies have become more integrated and their societies more diverse. The authors conclude that, although powerful economic and social pressures clearly constrain national governments and lead to convergence in some areas, distinctive cultural and political processes preserve room for distinctive national responses to important problems of the late twentieth century. Authors include Keith Banting, Paul Boothe (University of Alberta), Marsha Chandler (University of Toronto), George Hoberg, Robert Howse (University of Toronto), Christopher Manfredi (McGill University), George Perlin (Queen's University), Douglas Purvis (Queen's University), Richard Simeon, and Elaine Willis (consultant, Toronto).
Related books and articles
The Government Taketh Away: The Politics of Pain in the United States and Canada By Leslie A. Pal; R. Kent Weaver Georgetown University Press, 2003
Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946-1997 By David E. Lewis Stanford University Press, 2003
The Politics of Abortion in the United States and Canada: A Comparative Study By Raymond Tatalovich M. E. Sharpe, 1997
Schooling and Ethnocultural Communities in Canada: Alternatives for Planning A Post-Modern Century By Churchill, Stacy Kaprielian-Churchill, Isabel Ethnic Studies Review, Vol. 22, No. 1,2,&3, April 3, 1999PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICALPeer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Political Economy and Public Policy of Marginalization: Alternative Development, Multilevel Planning and Disadvantaged Communities in Slovenia and Canada By Durnik, Mitja Journal of Comparative Politics, Vol. 5, No. 1, January 2012PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICALPeer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Land Use Planning on Aboriginal Lands-Towards a New Model for Planning on Reserve Lands By Millette, Daniel M. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, Vol. 20, No. 2, Winter 2011PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICALPeer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Canada's Capital-2: Planning a Capital for All Canadians By Gordon, David Inroads: A Journal of Opinion, No. 30, Spring 2012
Expert Analysis of the NAU: Dr. Jerome Corsi Shares His In-Depth Knowledge of the Effort to Create One Political Entity out of the United States, Canada, and Mexico By McManus, John F. The New American, Vol. 22, No. 20, October 2, 2006
Oceans of Neglect: Add Some Political Will, and Canada Could Be Protecting Its Marine Areas By Alternatives Journal, Vol. 35, No. 4, September-October 2009
Distrust of Development in UK, US and Canada Soars; PLANNING By The Birmingham Post (England), June 5, 2007
Bush Denies Planning for a Superstate; Calls Mexico, Canada Pact Talk 'Scare Tactics' By Ward, Jon The Washington Times (Washington, DC), August 22, 2007
Government Should Start the Party Planning for Canada's 150th: Committee By Ditchburn, Jennifer The Canadian Press, September 24, 2012