Advertising Recall

Advertising recall is one measure marketers use to gauge the effectiveness of advertisements. This method is in wide use by marketers. The day after recall test (DAR), for instance, is often used to determine the efficiency of a new television commercial in generating consumer attention.

In the DAR test, a test commercial is run on one television channel during a chosen time slot. A random sampling of consumers is phoned 24 hours later. The caller determines whether the subject watched that particular channel during the period the commercial was aired. Once the respondent verifies this fact, certain questions are asked in an effort to determine whether the subject remembers viewing the commercial. If the subject remembers seeing the commercial, the next step is to determine which details of the commercial are recalled.

The caller asks "unaided" and "aided probes." The language used in the caller questions is crafted to elicit responses with little prompting. DAR test scores are then used as diagnostic marketing tools. Advertising firms often decide on a base recall score. Any commercial that fails to meet the minimum DAR percentage will be taken out of circulation.

One issue in using recall for measuring advertising effectiveness, revolves around what it is that recall measures. It is impossible to demonstrate by theory or with empirical evidence that a direct link exists between recall and suasion. Cognitive psychologist R. Norman, in his work, "When what is said is important: A comparison of expert and attractive sources," in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, found that attention to a stimulus is a prerequisite for recalling the stimulus, but may not be sufficient.

Therefore, the use of recall as the only method for measuring consumer attention to a product would not generate a true or total picture of advertising effectiveness. Advertising recall overlooks two critical possibilities:

1. Outside or additional factors affecting recall and suasion

2. Advertisements that persuade consumers in spite of a lack of consumer recall

The marketer should consider these questions:

1. When the consumer does recall an advertisement, what level of persuasion is expected?

2. Can certain situations or factors be identified that might increase the value of recall as a reliable measure of consumer persuasion?

3. What factors might improve consumer memory for advertisements that might also enhance persuasion?

Research has shown only a tenuous relationship between recall and persuasion. For example, a report by H. L. Ross in 1982, "Recall versus persuasion: An Answer," in Journal of Advertising Research, on 142 commercials for products belonging to 55 different categories found that only 10 percent of the sampled viewers changed their brand preference due to television commercials. These results were based on the Mapes and Ross system which uses both the DAR and brand preference change as measures.

In 1983, L.D. Gibson reviewed eight studies that analyzed the connection between recall and persuasion in his work "Not Recall," in Journal of Advertising Research. Each of the studies found a weak or insignificant relationship between recall and persuasion. One study found that recall and persuasion had a correlation of 0.5. Another study found a negligible relationship between recall and persuasion for the 52 commercials tested.

These results show either no relationship between advertising recall and persuasion, or at the most, a very weak relationship. Still, none of the studies in question undertook to micro-examine the issue with psychological methodology and theory. Such theory might be applied to identify factors affecting advertising recall and which might mediate any link between recall and persuasion. This leaves open the possibility that there might be certain conditions under which the relationship is liable to exist.

There has been some research into the relationship between recall and persuasion using social psychology methods. Rather than exploring advertising recall, a number of these studies looked at persuasion literature. Here too, researchers found a weak or nonexistent relationship between recall and persuasion whether researchers employed methods of correlation as in the work of W. Wilson and H. Miller in their 1968 report, "Repetition, order of presentation, and timing of arguments and measures as determinants of opinion change," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, or compared attitude and trends in information retention times as in the 1963 report from D. Papageorgis, "Bartlett effect and the persistence of induced opinion change," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, and the 1964 work of W. A. Watts and W.J. McGuire, "Persistency of induced opinion change and retention of the inducing message contents," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. A. G. Greenwald reviewed this research in 1968 in "Cognitive learning, cognitive response to attitude change," Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, and found an insignificant relationship between recall and persuasion arguments.

Several other studies, such as the one outlined by S. T. Fiske, in his 1982 work, Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception, looked at impression formation as a vehicle for illustrating a possible relationship between information recall and persuasion. For example, subjects were presented with information about imaginary individuals and asked to give impressions of each individual. Later on, the subjects were asked to relate what they could remember from the original information presented.

An information integration model was created to discover which information was most significant in forming an impression. Here, the relationship between the importance of the information and the likelihood of recall demonstrated a correlation close to zero. Instead, the greatest impression was made by information presented first, while recall was best for information presented last.

Social psychological research only examined recall in relation to specific information, a single stimulus and evaluation. Despite these shortcomings, this research indicates no clear relationship between recall and evaluation or persuasion. In the field of advertising, more work needs to be done on the underlying cognitive issues in recall if a clear relationship between recall and persuasion is to be demonstrated.

Advertising Recall: Selected full-text books and articles

Implicit Memory Measures for Web Advertising Effectiveness By Yoo, Chan Yun Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 84, No. 1, Spring 2007
PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICAL
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Advertising Exposure, Memory, and Choice By Andrew A. Mitchell Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993
Librarian’s tip: Chap. 1 "Memory Retrieval Factors and Advertising Effectiveness"
The Effect of Memory Structure and Function on Consumers' Perception and Recall of Marketing Messages: A Review of the Memory Research in Marketing By O'Donnell, Edward; Brown, Steven Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, January 1, 2011
PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICAL
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Market Research: Recall vs Recognition By Miles, Louella Marketing, April 21, 2004
Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects: Theory, Research, and Applications By Linda F. Alwitt; Andrew A. Mitchell Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985
Librarian’s tip: Chap. 6 "The Relationship between Advertising Recall and Persuasion: An Experimental Investigation"
Advertising and the Mind of the Consumer: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why By Max Sutherland Allen & Unwin, 2008 (3rd Revised edition)
Librarian’s tip: Especially Chap. 21 "Why Radio Ads Aren't Recalled," Chap. 27 "Measurement of Advertising Effects in Memory"
Measuring Advertising Effectiveness By William D. Wells Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997
Librarian’s tip: Chap. 11 "Understanding Consumer Memory for Ads: A Process View"
Effectiveness of Online Advertisement Factors in Recalling a Product By Alijani, Ghasem S.; Mancuso, Louis C.; Kwun, Obyung; Omar, Adnan Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, January 1, 2010
PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICAL
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Effect of Deceptive Advertising on Claim Recall: An Experimental Research By Nagar, Komal Journal of Services Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, October-March 2009
PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICAL
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Demographic and Psychographic Variables Predicting NASCAR Sponsor Brand Recall By Kinney, Lance; McDaniel, Stephen R.; DeGaris, Larry International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, Vol. 9, No. 3, April 2008
PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICAL
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Ad Recall on Tablet Magazines Equal to Print: GfK Study Finds Recall Average at 52 Percent on Both Mediums By Wood, Samantha Folio: the Magazine for Magazine Management, Vol. 43, No. 5, July-August 2014
Word-of-Author Advertising in Textbooks: The Role of Brand Familiarity and Placement Repetition on Recall and Recognition By Brennan, Ian; McCalman, David Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, January 2011
PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICAL
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Brand Recall and Recognition: A Comparison of Television and Sport Video Games as Presentation Modes By Walsh, Patrick; Kim, Yongjae; Ross, Stephen D Sport Marketing Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, December 2008
PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICAL
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Are Unclicked Ads Wasted? Enduring Effects of Banner and Pop-Up Ad Exposures on Brand Memory and Attitudes By Chatterjee, Patrali Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, February 1, 2008
PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICAL
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
The Impact of Brand Placement and Brand Recall in Movies: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia By Balakrishnan, Bamimi K. P. D.; Shuaib, Azlinda Shazneem Md; Dousin, Oscar; Permarupan, P. Yukthamarani International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, May 1, 2012
PEER-REVIEWED PERIODICAL
Peer-reviewed publications on Questia are publications containing articles which were subject to evaluation for accuracy and substance by professional peers of the article's author(s).
Emotion in Advertising: Theoretical and Practical Explorations By Stuart J. Agres; Julie A. Edell; Tony M. Dubitsky Quorum Books, 1990
Librarian’s tip: Chap. 14 "Consumer Emotional Reactions to Television Advertising and Their Effects on Message Recall"
Looking for a topic idea? Use Questia's Topic Generator
Author Advanced search

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.