Test Your Knowledge of Professional Ethics

Article excerpt

*This quiz is based on AICPA professional ethics division staff responses to written inquiries from members. It is not a pronouncement of the professional ethics executive committee nor does it purport to set forth an official position of the AICPA. In addition, the questions and answers do not address the requirements of other regulatory bodies, such as the state boards of accountancy and the Securities and Exchange Commission, whose positions may differ from those of the AICPA.

Edited by HERBERT FINKSTON, director of the AICPA professional ethics division.


From time to time the Journal publishes questions on ethics topics that have been raised by members of the American Institute of CPAs. This group deals with interpretations under Conduct Rules 101-Independence, 505-Form of Practice and Name and 301-Confidential Client Information. * C ONCERNING INDEPENDENCE

1 . The brother of a partner's spouse is the 50% owner of a prospective audit client of the partner's firm. Would the firm be considered independent with respect to the prospective client?

Yes No

2. A member's client is a 30% owner of a corporation. The investment is material to the client. May the member invest in the corporation without impairing independence with respect to the client?

Yes No

3. The stepbrother of a manager in a firm is the president of a prospective audit client. The stepbrothers have a common father and, therefore, carry the same name. State probate law dictates that individuals with one common parent are treated as full blood siblings. Would the stepbrother's job with the prospective client impair firm independence?

Yes No

4. A partner of a firm is a part-time faculty member of a university. The partner has been asked to audit a local foundation whose sole function is to provide scholarships to students attending the university. All scholarship applications are received from the students. Additionally, the university and the foundation do not have any common directors or employees. Would the partner's independence be considered impaired with respect to the foundation?

Yes No

5. A staff accountant in a firm has an immaterial direct financial interest in a prospective audit client of the firm. Would the firm be precluded from expressing an opinion on the client's financial statements due to a lack of independence?

Yes No

6. A partner of a firm resigned from a corporation's board of directors as of March 31, 1989. In February 1990, the firm was asked to perform an audit of the corporation's financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1989. Would the firm be considered to be independent with respect to the corporation?

Yes No


7. A member's firm is currently named Jones, Smith & Company. The partners wish to change the firm name to one that reflects the services offered, for example, Litigation Support Consultants. Would the proposed firm name be permissible under Rule 505?

Yes No

8. A member is establishing an accounting practice as a sole practitioner. Would it be permissible for the firm's name to include "and Company"?

Yes No


9. A regulatory agency has asked a member to supply confidential client information in connection with an investigation of the client. …


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.