Academic journal article Journal of Accountancy

Back Pay to Settle Discrimination Claim Not Excludable

Academic journal article Journal of Accountancy

Back Pay to Settle Discrimination Claim Not Excludable

Article excerpt

Sparrow sued his former employer, the Department of the Navy, alleging racial discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The complaint ultimately was settled. Sparrow received about $90,000 over a three-year period and reported none of it as income. The IRS claimed Sparrow owed tax on the payments.

In the Tax Court, Sparrow argued all the settlement payments were excludable from gross income under IRC section 104(a)(2), which excludes "damages . . . on account of personal injuries." The Tax Court ruled in the IRS's favor, finding (1) the entire settlement constituted back pay and (2) none of it was excludable because Title VII only authorizes equitable, not legal remedies and amount received pursuant to equitable remedies are not excludable under section 104(a)(2).

Result: The back-pay award was not excludable. The District of Columbia Circuit based its conclusion on the purely legal distinction between legal and equitable remedies. The section 104(a)(2) exclusion, it said, is limited to damages recoverable in an action at law (legal damages) and does not cover equitable relief. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.