Academic journal article Journal of Accountancy

Appealing Innocent Spouse Relief

Academic journal article Journal of Accountancy

Appealing Innocent Spouse Relief

Article excerpt

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently considered the effects of the changes in the innocent spouse provision contained in the IRS Restructuring Act of 1998.

In 1966 Isaac Baranowicz and Lora Baran married. On their 1979-1982 tax returns, they claimed depreciation deductions from several equipment-leasing tax shelters. The IRS issued a deficiency notice denying these deductions. Following the couple's divorce, Lora Baran filed for innocent spouse relief under IRC sections 6015 (b) and (c), which contain part of the rules for such protection. The Tax Court granted her such relief under section 6015(c). Isaac Baranowicz appealed, but the IRS argued he lacked the standing to do so.

Result. For the IRS. To initiate an appeal, taxpayers must meet three conditions: They must allege a concrete injury, the injury must be traceable to the defendant's actions and a favorable decision must provide redress. Prior to the 1998 Restructuring Act, the courts would have held that granting Lora innocent spouse relief could not have affected Isaac's tax liability since he still would be liable for the entire deficiency under the joint and several liability rule.

Baranowicz argued that under the act a nonrequesting spouse could participate in the initial litigation and, therefore, would be entitled to appeal the decision.

The Ninth Circuit found that Baranowicz's participation in the initial litigation would not have changed his liability; he would have remained fully liable for the deficiency both before and after the lawsuit. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.