Avoiding Managed Care's Pitfalls and Pratfalls: How to Submit Claims That Rise above Harsh Scrutiny

Article excerpt

Physician career satisfaction has declined since the mid-1990s, and managed care gets much of the blame (1,2) (see Instant Poll, page 4). Doctors associate managed care with:

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

* loss of autonomy (3)

* increased paperwork

* less time with patients

* frustrating phone calls with insurance company representatives.

Patients come to us with many types of medical insurance, and we often are unsure if they have adequate coverage. The stakes are high; career satisfaction and practice viability depend on prompt reimbursement without hassle, and successful outcomes depend on patients getting the care they need.

The "pitfalls" of managed care in mental health practice can be minimized, however. This article describes how to decrease the frustration, time, and effort you spend obtaining authorizations and receiving reimbursement.

MANAGED CARE PRIMER

Understanding how managed care works can help you develop more positive interactions with these systems. Managed care exists to help control medical costs. Restricting services is one method of medical cost control, but employers and government payers also are interested in improving disease prevention, recognition, and management.

Delivering health benefits. The process begins when a business or government entity develops a summary plan description (SPD) (Box 1), defining what medical and mental health care services a policy covers (Figure).

A managed care company--typically a health maintenance organization (HMO) or similar entity--enters into a contract to implement and manage health care benefits for all persons covered by the plan. Because of their complexity, mental health services are usually "carved out" (Box 2, page 22) (4) to a mental health specialty managed care company.

Utilization review. Whenever you deliver mental health care, your claims and treatment plans are scrutinized through utilization review (UR). Before authorizing payment, reviewers typically screen claims to:

* verify that the patient's benefit plan covers the service

* establish the service's medical necessity

* ensure that the treatment meets accepted standards of care.

UR staff in most managed care companies have administrative authority to authorize care, but care can be denied only by a medical director--typically a psychiatrist who reviews the clinical information submitted by the provider.

EXAMPLE 1:

Claim authorization. A psychiatrist evaluates a patient and diagnoses major depression. The psychiatrist submits a treatment plan to the managed care company requesting authorization for 6 medication management and 10 psychotherapy sessions for the next 12 months. A UR representative reviews the plan, verifies the patient has appropriate coverage, and authorizes the sessions.

EXAMPLE 2:

Claim denial. A psychiatrist evaluates a patient and diagnoses major depression. The psychiatrist submits a treatment plan to the managed care company, requesting authorization for 10 EEG biofeedback sessions to treat the depression. A UR representative examines the plan and asks the medical director to review it. The medical director denies authorization because EEG biofeedback does not meet accepted standards for depression treatment.

[FIGURE OMITTED]

Negotiating exceptions. Managed care companies must follow the letter of the benefits they administer. Some employers, however, allow for a "benefit exception" when practitioners identify patient services not covered under the benefit that, if implemented, might improve care and reduce costs.

If you encounter a situation where you believe plan limitations might adversely affect patient outcome and expense, point it out to the managed care company and ask if the patient's plan allows benefit exceptions. Some plans do not allow for partial hospitalization, for example. …

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.