Academic journal article Journal of Accountancy

From the Defense: How to Combat a Deepening Insolvency Claim

Academic journal article Journal of Accountancy

From the Defense: How to Combat a Deepening Insolvency Claim

Article excerpt

In 2007, I represented Grant Thornton in its challenge of a deepening insolvency claim in Minnesota. The decision by the Minnesota Court of Appeals in the case--Julia A. Christians, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Technimar Industries Inc. v. Grant Thornton LLP--could provide useful lessons for accounting firms.

Technimar planned to manufacture a product used, among other things, to make kitchen countertops. The company required an expensive piece of equipment for the manufacturing process. To get the money needed to fuel the operation, Technimar entered into a series of complex financial arrangements, the final piece of which was a bond offering.

During the bond offering, Technimar failed to disclose to its lender and the public entities guaranteeing a portion of the debt that it had fundamentally altered the payment terms of the equipment contract. Technimar had secretly obligated itself to an accelerated repayment schedule that, if not met, would relieve the manufacturer of the obligation to deliver the necessary equipment.

Technimar failed to account for this agreement in its financials. The company could not meet the repayment schedule. It defaulted on the bond and never received the necessary equipment. Ultimately, the company declared Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

The bankruptcy trustee sued Grant Thornton, contending Technimar was insolvent at the time of the bond offering and that the inability of the auditors to discover the accelerated repayment agreement "deepened" the insolvency by allowing the company to accumulate debt it could not repay.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's award of summary judgment in favor of Grant Thornton on all counts. The court held that Minnesota did not recognize an insolvent corporation's taking on debt to be a distinct form of damages and thus refused to recognize deepening insolvency as a damage theory. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.