Academic journal article Journal of Accountancy

FLPs Revisited

Academic journal article Journal of Accountancy

FLPs Revisited

Article excerpt

The Tax Court ruled, contrary to the IRS's argument, that the step transaction doctrine did not apply where gifts of interests in a family limited partnership (FLP) were made only six days after the funding of the partnership with stock. However, the court also partially denied the taxpayers' discounts for lack of control and marketability of those interests.

FLPs are often used for estate tax planning and reduction and asset protection. But they need to establish a significant non-tax reason for transfers of assets to them and operate in a businesslike manner (see "FLPs That Flop," JofA, April 08, page 72).

Thomas H. and Kim D.L. Holman transferred more than 70,000 shares of stock in Thomas' then-employer, computer maker Dell Inc., to an FLP on Nov. 2, 1999. On Nov. 8, 1999, they made gifts of FLP interests to an account established for the benefit of their minor children and reduced the value of the interests by 14.25% for minority interest and by 35% for lack of marketability. The gifting program continued through 2001. The partnership could be dissolved only by written consent of all partners for the next 50 years and allowed limited partners (the children) to withdraw or assign their interests only by prior written consent of all partners.

The IRS, citing the step transaction doctrine, treated the 1999 transaction as an indirect gift of the stock. It assessed deficiencies of more than $232,000 for the three years. The court, however, concluded that even in the six days between the funding of the FLP and the gifts the assets were exposed to real economic risk from a potential market decline, because of the relative volatility of Dell shares. "We draw no bright lines," the court said, although in a footnote, it added it might look less favorably on more stable assets, such as long-term government bonds or preferred stock.

The taxpayers fared less well in arguing for valuation discounts for transfer restrictions. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.